Children's Medicaid Enrollment Increased During First Year Of Consolidated Appropriations Act.

National continuous Medicaid eligibility under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) may have differentially affected children's health care depending on whether states had preexisting 12-month continuous Medicaid eligibility for children. To estimate the association of states newly implementing continuous Medicaid eligibility under the FFCRA with children's health care access, health care use, and barriers to care. This survey study used a difference-in-differences research design comparing states before (2017-2019) and during (2020-2022) the FFCRA overall, by caregiver-reported race and ethnicity, and among publicly insured children. Analyses used data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), an annual household survey on the health and well-being of children 0 to 17 years old in the US. Data were analyzed from September 2024 to March 2025. Whether states had pre-FFCRA 12-month continuous Medicaid eligibility for children. Insurance coverage, gaps in coverage, unmet health care needs, any health care visits, preventive visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, any time spent weekly arranging children's health care, and problems paying medical bills. The sample included 215 884 children, with children in states with pre-FFCRA continuous eligibility being similar to children in states newly implementing continuous eligibility with respect to age (8.6 years old in both sets of states), gender (49.6% female compared to 48.5%), and nativity (66.7% third generation or longer with all parents born in the US vs 69.6%), with lower proportions who were non-Hispanic Black (11.9% compared to 13.8%) or non-Hispanic White (50.5% compared to 52.9%), and higher proportions who were Hispanic (25.5% compared to 23.9%). In adjusted difference-in-difference models, newly implementing continuous eligibility under the FFCRA was associated with a 0.7-percentage point (95% CI, -1.2 to -0.1 percentage point) reduction in children's unmet health care needs. There was no evidence of additional FFCRA-associated changes in outcomes overall. In subgroup analyses, there were reductions in coverage gaps, unmet health care needs, and time spent arranging care among Hispanic children and publicly insured children. In this survey study, newly implementing continuous eligibility for children under the FFCRA was associated with reductions in unmet health care needs and no additional changes in health care outcomes overall, with additional benefits for Hispanic children and publicly insured children. This could reflect expected changes under mandatory, national 12-month continuous eligibility for children implemented in January 2024.

From 1984 to 1990. Congress enacted a series of mandates that expanded Medicaid eligibility for low-income children by gradually delinking Medicaid eligibility from welfare eligibility. The 1996 national welfare reform law nominally completed the delinking process when the statutory phase-in of children's Medicaid coverage was preserved even as the states were given increased flexibility for administering welfare programs. This article provides estimates of the impact of these fedcral policy changes on children's Medicaid enrollment rates and analyzes the degree of success in uncoupling children's Medicaid enrollment from welfare. Data from the Current Population Survey for 1979 to 1998 are used to provide standardized enrollment probabilities for the United States and individual states. The results show important enrollment increases associated with the period of the mandated expansions, followed by enrollment declines associated with welfare reform. The largest increases in enrollment during this period were in states with historically restrictive welfare eligibility, but rates also rose in states that previously had relatively expansive welfare eligibility. The net effect was a reduction in the extent of state-to-state variation in enrollment. The Medicaid expansion peaked in 1995, prior to the advent of national welfare reform. Since then, children's Medicaid enrollment has fallen, with the largest declines falling on families with the very lowest incomes. Consistent with the desire to delink children's Medicaid coverage from welfare, the association between Medicaid and AFDC/TANF enrollment weakened during the expansionary period, but there still was a relatively strong relationship between policy outcomes for these two programs. Despite the policy changes, Medicaid coverage of children is still influenced by state-level welfare policy.

Turning and Churning: Loss of Health Insurance Among Adults in Medicaid

Background and ObjectivesRecent evidence supports a link between caregivers’ health literacy and their children’s health and use of health services. Disruptions in children’s health insurance coverage have been linked to poor health care and outcomes. We examined young children’s Medicaid enrollment patterns in a well-characterized cohort of child/caregivers dyads and investigated the association of caregivers’ low health literacy with the incidence of enrollment gaps.MethodsWe relied upon Medicaid enrollment data for 1208 children (mean age = 19 months) enrolled in the Carolina Oral Health Literacy project during 2008–09. The median follow-up was 25 months. Health literacy was measured using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS). Analyses relied on descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate methods based on Poisson modeling.FindingsOne-third of children experienced one or more enrollment gaps; most were short in duration (median = 5 months). The risk of gaps was inversely associated with caregivers’ age, with a 2% relative risk decrease for each added year. Low health literacy was associated with a modestly elevated risk increase [Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) = 1.17 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88–1.57)] for enrollment disruptions; however, this estimate was substantially elevated among caregivers with less than a high school education [IRR = 1.52 (95% CI 0.99–2.35); homogeneity p<0.2].ConclusionsOur findings provide initial support for a possible role of caregivers’ health literacy as a determinant of children’s Medicaid enrollment gaps. Although the association between health literacy and enrollment gaps was not confirmed statistically, we found that it was markedly stronger among caregivers with low educational attainment. This population, as well as young caregivers, may be the most vulnerable to the negative effects of low health literacy.

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established federal grants to the states to create the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). This presented the states with a number of implementation choices concerning administrative models for the new programs, as well as choices about eligibility standards, enrollment simplification, crowd-out, and cost sharing requirements. At the same time, the states were also implementing welfare reform. We describe the most important of these implementation choices, and using data from the Current Population Survey, we estimate the impacts of state policy on enrollment in this multiprogram environment. The results indicate that SCHIP programs that are administered as Medicaid expansions are more successful than either separate SCHIP plans or combination programs in enrolling children. States that remove asset tests and implement presumptive eligibility and self-declaration of income have higher enrollment levels. Continuous eligibility and adoption of mail-in applications have no effect on overall enrollment. Waiting periods and premiums reduce enrollment. Stringent welfare reform reduces children's enrollment, despite federal policy that was intended to protect children from the consequences of welfare reform. The negative impacts of a number of these policy reforms substantially reduce enrollment, potentially offsetting the more favorable impacts of other policy choices. We estimate that if all states adopted the policy options that facilitate program use, enrollment for children with family incomes less than 200 percent of the poverty line could be raised from the current rate of 42 percent to 58 percent.

We examined children's Medicaid participation during 2019-21 and found that as of March 2021, states newly adopting continuous Medicaid coverage for children during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced a 4.62percent relative increase in children's Medicaid participation compared to states with previous continuous eligibility policies.

Pursuant to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), continuous Medicaid eligibility during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) created a de facto national extension of pregnancy Medicaid eligibility beyond 60 days postpartum. To evaluate the association of continuous Medicaid eligibility with postpartum health insurance, health care use, breastfeeding, and depressive symptoms. This cohort study using a generalized difference-in-differences design included 21 states with continuous prepolicy (2017-2019) and postpolicy (2020-2021) participation in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). State-level change in Medicaid income eligibility after 60 days postpartum associated with the FFCRA measured as a percent of the federal poverty level (FPL; ie, the difference in 2020 income eligibility thresholds for pregnant people and low-income adults/parents). Health insurance, postpartum visit attendance, contraceptive use (any effective method; long-acting reversible contraceptives), any breastfeeding and depressive symptoms at the time of the PRAMS survey (mean [SD], 4 [1.3] months postpartum). The sample included 47 716 PRAMS respondents (64.4% aged <30 years; 18.9% Hispanic, 26.2% non-Hispanic Black, 36.3% non-Hispanic White, and 18.6% other race or ethnicity) with a Medicaid-paid birth. Based on adjusted estimates, a 100% FPL increase in postpartum Medicaid eligibility was associated with a 5.1 percentage point (pp) increase in reported postpartum Medicaid enrollment, no change in commercial coverage, and a 6.6 pp decline in uninsurance. This represents a 40% reduction in postpartum uninsurance after a Medicaid-paid birth compared with the prepolicy baseline of 16.7%. In subgroup analyses by race and ethnicity, uninsurance reductions were observed only among White and Black non-Hispanic individuals; Hispanic individuals had no change. No policy-associated changes were observed in other outcomes. In this cohort study, continuous Medicaid eligibility during the COVID-19 PHE was associated with significantly reduced postpartum uninsurance for people with Medicaid-paid births, but was not associated with postpartum visit attendance, contraception use, breastfeeding, or depressive symptoms at approximately 4 months postpartum. These findings, though limited to the context of the COVID-19 PHE, may offer preliminary insight regarding the potential impact of post-pandemic postpartum Medicaid eligibility extensions. Collection of longer-term and more comprehensive follow-up data on postpartum health care and health will be critical to evaluating the effect of ongoing postpartum policy interventions.

In April2023, with the "unwinding" of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) continuous enrollment provisions in Medicaid, states were permitted to commence redetermination and disenrollment procedures for Medicaid beneficiaries. Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services monthly state enrollment data for forty-nine states and Washington, D.C., from the period January2021-December2023, we examined changes in children's Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage during the Medicaid unwinding, both overall and by whether states had previous twelve-month continuous eligibility policies for children and by the structure of states' programs for CHIP. We found substantially lower Medicaid and CHIP enrollment among children during the unwinding than during the FFCRA period, with lower levels of coverage declines among children in states that had previous twelve-month continuous eligibility policies and states with a program structure of separate CHIP or Medicaid expansion CHIP, rather than combination CHIP. These findings highlight the consequences of the FFCRA unwinding for children's Medicaid and CHIP enrollment, as well as potential state health policies that can promote coverage continuity and prevent further coverage loss for children moving forward.

To compare patterns of routine postpartum health care utilization for women in Wisconsin with continuous Medicaid eligibility versus pregnancy-only Medicaid METHODS: This analysis used Medicaid records and linked infant birth certificates for Medicaid paid births in Wisconsin during 2011-2015 (n = 105,718). We determined if women had continuous or pregnancy-only eligibility from the Medicaid eligibility file. We used a standard list of billing codes to identify if women received routine postpartum care. We examined maternal characteristics and receipt of postpartum care overall and by Medicaid eligibility category. Finally, we used a binomial model to calculate the relationship between Medicaid eligibility category and receipt of postpartum care, adjusted for maternal characteristics. Women with continuous Medicaid had profiles more consistent with low postpartum visit attendance rates (e.g., younger, more likely to use tobacco) than women with pregnancy-only Medicaid. However, after adjusting for maternal characteristics, women with continuous Medicaid eligibility had a postpartum visit rate that was 6 percentage points higher than the rate for women with pregnancy-only Medicaid (RD: 6.27, 95% CI 5.72, 6.82). Women with pregnancy-only Medicaid were less likely to have received routine postpartum care than women with continuous Medicaid. Medicaid coverage beyond the current guaranteed 60days postpartum could help provide more women access to postpartum care.

To develop a comprehensive predictive model of eligible children's enrollment in California's Medicaid (Medi-Cal [MC]) and State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP; Healthy Families [HF]) programs. 2001 California Health Interview Survey data, data on outstationed eligibility workers (OEWs), and administrative data from state agencies and local health insurance expansion programs for fiscal year 2000-2001. The study examined the effects of multiple family-level factors and contextual county-level factors on children's enrollment in Medicaid and SCHIP. Simple logistical regression analyses were conducted with sampling weights. Hierarchical logistic regressions were run to control for clustering. Participation in MC and HF programs is determined by a combination of family-level predisposing, perceived need, and enabling/disabling factors, and county-level enabling/disabling factors. The strongest predictors of MC enrollment were family-level immigration status, ethnicity, and income, and the presence of a county-level "expansion program"; and the county-level ratio of OEWs to eligible children. Important HF enrollment predictors included family-level ethnicity, age, number of hours a parent worked, and urban residence; and county-level population size and outreach and media expenditure. MC and HF outreach/enrollment efforts should target poorer and immigrant families (especially Latinos), older children, and children living in larger and urban counties. To reach uninsured eligible children, it is important to further simplify the application process and fund selected outreach efforts. Local health insurance expansion programs increase children's enrollment in MC.

The 1996 federal welfare reform law delinked Medicaid enrollment from welfare participation. This paper estimates the impact of welfare reform on children's Medicaid enrollment using a methodology that both adjusts for income and other demographic differences over time and across states, and provides income-specific estimates of enrollment. The results indicate large enrollment declines: Between 1995 and 1998, enrollment probabilities for children in families with no income declined from 81 percent to 68 percent, while at half the poverty line, the decline was from 61 percent to 53 percent. This implies that 926,000 to 1.37 million fewer children were enrolled after welfare reform. At the state level, Medicaid declines and welfare reform were strongly associated, with only a few states succeeding in preserving children's Medicaid coverage.

Persons with schizophrenia are heavy and persistent users of Medicaid services. Interruptions in their Medicaid coverage may have serious consequences for the mental health of these individuals and their subsequent use of mental health services. This study sought to determine the impact of interruptions in Medicaid coverage on the use of Medicaid-reimbursed inpatient psychiatric services over a four-year period. Inpatient Medicaid claims and eligibility files for 1,830 Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia in Utah from December 1990 to December 1994 were used to identify differences in hospital admissions and total number of days in a hospital associated with interrupted Medicaid coverage. Of the 1,830 Medicaid beneficiaries identified, 1,463 experienced continuous Medicaid eligibility, and 367 had interruptions in their eligibility. Interruptions in Medicaid coverage were associated with an average of.63 more psychiatric hospitalizations per beneficiary over the four-year period, representing an 86 percent higher hospital admission rate. This increase appeared to be largely due to a subset of persons who have much higher hospitalization rates after an interruption in Medicaid coverage. Interruptions in Medicaid coverage were associated with a mean of 8.3 more days of psychiatric hospitalization over the four-year period, representing 61 percent more hospital days. Medicaid beneficiaries who experience interruptions in coverage have, on average, a significantly greater use of inpatient psychiatric services while participating in Medicaid than beneficiaries with continuous Medicaid coverage. These findings suggest potential benefits of maintaining continuous Medicaid eligibility for beneficiaries with a severe mental illness.

An important focus of the federalism literature has been on analyzing the responses of lower levels of government to the financial incentives of intergovernmental grant programs. But grant conditions and mandates are also important features of grant programs, and these have received considerably less attention in the literature. This article examines the implementation of federal Medicaid mandates during the 1980s and 1990s to explicitly compare the relative responses of the states to matching rate incentives and statutory mandates. Using individual‐level information on program enrollment to measure policy implementation, the results indicate that the federal mandates led to large changes in children's Medicaid enrollment. In contrast, the effects of the federal matching rate were much more limited. Moreover, the statutory mandates not only raised the average level of enrollment but also reduced the degree of policy variation across the states. While the current pattern of federal Medicaid matching payments reduces policy variation to some extent, these effects are modest compared to the impacts of the mandates. Mandates are a more powerful instrument for national policymakers than the comparatively weak fiscal incentives provided by matching rates.

To assess the coverage effects of California's 2011 Low-Income Health Program (LIHP), enacted as an "early expansion" under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and to demonstrate the feasibility of using Census data to measure county-level coverage changes. 2008-2012 American Community Survey (ACS). The sample contained California adults ages 19-64 years (n=237,876) and children 0-18 years (n=113,159) with incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Differences-in-differences analysis comparing public coverage, private insurance, and the uninsured rate in counties that expanded the LIHP in 2011 versus California counties not expanding during this time. Additional analyses tested for heterogeneous impacts of the LIHP and spillover effects on children. Compared to nonexpansion counties, public coverage for adults increased by 1.8 percentage points (p=.02) in expanding counties, while the uninsured rate declined by 2.1 percentage points (p=.01). There was no significant change in private coverage. Public coverage gains were largest for Latinos and those with limited English proficiency. The expansion produced a positive spillover effect on children's Medicaid enrollment. California's 2011 expansion produced significant increases in public coverage for low-income individuals, particularly Latinos. Substate coverage analyses with the ACS can add valuable detail to future assessments of the ACA.

To assess whether increasing enrollment in State Children's Health Insurance Programs (S-CHIPs) has an impact on the number of office physicians participating in Medicaid and the extent of their participation. Effects are measured for a freestanding S-CHIP program with an open provider panel and an S-CHIP program that uses the state's Medicaid provider panel. Children's Medicaid claims data for primary care services were used to measure physician participation in the program; census and enrollment data were used to describe market area characteristics. Study Design. This is a time series study of communities in two states, measuring physician Medicaid participation quarterly between 1998 and 2001, controlling for changes in community characteristics and children's program enrollment as well as other factors by quarter. Office physician participation is measured by practice site. Claims data are aggregated to the level of the community and reflect the number of limited practice sites, the ratio of Medicaid office sites to the number of primary care physicians in the community as reported by the American Medical Association (AMA), and the mean number of Medicaid office visits made to physician sites in the community in the quarter. In Alabama, the state with a freestanding S-CHIP program, there is little association between increased S-CHIP enrollment and physician participation in Medicaid. In Georgia, where the same provider network serves both programs, increases in S-CHIP enrollment are associated with a decline in office-based physician participation in Medicaid in urban areas. Linkage of S-CHIP and Medicaid programs through the use of the same provider network, in the absence of market conditions that encourage the expansion of the network, can lead to a negative impact on access for Medicaid enrollees.