Abstract

In this article, I argue that whereas Lewis Carroll builds the fantastic world of Alice’s dreams primarily through narration, Hans Christian Andersen uses patterns of lexical choices that recur throughout his opus to build a universe divided solely in terms of a distinction between what is genuine and what is artificial; and this distinction is a central player in all of his work. Arguably, therefore, attention to Andersen’s wider corpus, and to his use of lexis in it, are key to producing translations of Andersen’s work that reflect its essence.

Highlights

  • In this article, I briely contrast two authors, Hans Christian Andersen and Lewis Carroll both of whom who wrote “for children”, who use identiiably diferent techniques to create their ictional worlds

  • Children rarely had the facility and wherewithal to procure their own reading material; and the internet has made much reading material freely available for today’s child, and despite the availability of literature for children in public libraries, I suspect that books, e.g., for reading aloud and for reading in bed, are still oten acquired for a child by an adult

  • In any case, when my chosen authors were writing, there was no internet, and children were to a considerable degree dependent on their parents for entertainment of the kind that had to be paid for, including books. he point of my article is to show that of the diferent methods adopted by my chosen authors for creating a ictional world, one of them (Andersen) especially invites a translator to consider their individual translation choices in the context of the writer’s oeuvre as a whole; because of the need to illustrate this, the majority of my article is devoted to the author who uses this technique

Read more

Summary

Introduction

I briely contrast two authors, Hans Christian Andersen and Lewis Carroll both of whom who wrote “for children”, who use identiiably diferent techniques to create their ictional worlds. He two authors that I have chosen to concentrate on, Lewis Carroll and Hans Christian Andersen, both build ictional worlds in their works, but they do it in rather diferent ways, and it is instructive to muse on that.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.