Abstract

Begging behaviour is an important element in the parent-offspring conflict; it has been studied in many avian species. However, the majority of the studies have been entirely based on the call counts, and they agreed that vocal activity was a good indicator of chick’s nutritional need and/or condition. Fewer researches were dedicated to the temporal-frequency variables of the begging calls themselves and they showed contrary results. Here begging behaviour in three burrow nested, uniparous species of auks (Alcidae) was studied. These objects provide an opportunity to study the signalling value of begging calls in the absence of important confounding factors such as nestling competition and predation pressure. I recorded calls of individual chicks in two conditions: during natural feeding and after experimental four-hour food deprivation. I found that almost all measured acoustic variables contain information about the chick’s state in all studied species. The hungry chicks produced calls higher in fundamental frequency and power variables and at higher calling rate compared to naturally feeding chicks. The effect of food deprivation on most acoustic variables exceeded both the effects of individuality and species. In all studied species, the frequency variables were stronger affected by hunger than the calling rate and call durations. I suppose that such strong change of acoustic variables after food deprivation can be explained by absence of vocal individual identification in these birds. As parents do not need to check individuality of the chick in the burrow, which they find visually during the day time, the chicks could use all of the acoustic variables to communicate about their nutritional needs.

Highlights

  • In many bird species, nestlings use various signals for food begging [1, 2]

  • Data collection protocol #2013–48 was approved by the Committee of Bio-ethics of Lomonosov Moscow State University

  • Calls of food-deprived chicks differed from control chicks in most of all acoustic variables, for both chirp and weep calls (Tables 1 and 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nestlings use various signals for food begging [1, 2]. It is well known that chicks communicate their needs by begging, and parents use this information to adjust their investment [3]. Cues to offspring fitness and demand could be expressed in chick displays, like mouth colour, gaping, postures and behaviour, and influence parental provisioning [1, 4,5,6]. Vocalization is the most common form of begging behaviour in birds. Vocal begging displays have been well studied especially in passerines, and provide a good model for investigating the evolution of animal signals [1, 7, 8]. The narrow taxonomic scope of research on this

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.