Abstract
This paper attempts to explain the tendency of foreign acquirers to choose better performing firms in emerging markets, which limits underperforming firms’ access to foreign capital. Using a simple law and finance model, we offer an explanation based on emerging countries’ weaker investor protection (IP) compared to acquirers’ home countries, predicting a positive relation between the gap in the strength of IP (between acquiring and target countries) and the intensity to cherry pick. To test this prediction, we identify among our sample countries 20 economies that enacted major corporate governance reforms (CGRs). These CGRs change the gap in IP between an acquirer and a target country in a staggered fashion, enabling us to estimate differences-in-differences. Estimation results reveal that cherry picking moderates after a target country undertakes a CGR, which narrows the IP gap. Conversely, cherry picking intensifies after an acquirer’s home country enacts a CGR, which enlarges the IP gap. These results imply emerging economies must strengthen investor protection if they want to increase underperforming firms’ access to foreign capital.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
