Abstract
Fewer than one third of more than 100 chemicals tested prevented moulding when 0.5% of active ingredient was added to hay containing 35% water or, alternatively, when 0.02% of active ingredient was added with 0.2% propionic acid or ammonium propionate. Chemicals which prevented moulding in these tests when used alone included aliphatic acids with 2–6 carbon atoms, sorbic acid, short chain aldehydes and phenols, propionic acid, fully or half-neutralized with ammonia, and 8-quinolinol and its derivatives. Formic acid, aliphatic acids with 7–9 carbon atoms, longer chain aldehydes and some fungicides delayed moulding for one to two weeks. Only formaldehyde, 8-quinolinol and its derivatives, and p-nitrophenol increased the activity of 0.2% propionic acid. Although the effective doses of propionic acid, ammonium propionate, and propionic acid, half-neutralised with ammonia, were similar, there was evidence that the presence of free acid in the formulation aided redistribution to overcome undertreatment of pockets in the hay. Further tests of 2-phenyl phenol, phenyl propionate and 8-quinolinol showed that the latter was the best candidate for development. Fungi of the Aspergillus glaucus group were first to colonise most tests that failed, indicating their high degree of tolerance of a wide range of chemicals, and their value as test organisms for prospective preservatives.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.