Abstract

Muskox (Ovibos moschatus), as the biggest herbivore in the High Arctic, has been enduring the austere arctic nutritional conditions and has evolved to ingest and digest scarce and high lignified forages to support the growth and reproduce, implying probably harbor a distinct microbial reservoir for the deconstruction of plant biomass. Therefore, metagenomics approach was applied to characterize the rumen microbial community and understand the alteration in rumen microbiome of muskoxen fed either triticale straw or brome hay. The difference in the structure of microbial communities including bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protozoa between the two forages was observed at the taxonomic level of genus. Further, although the highly abundant phylotypes in muskoxen rumen fed either triticale straw or brome hay were almost the same, the selective enrichment different phylotypes for fiber degrading, soluble substrates fermenting, electron and hydrogen scavenging through methanogenesis, acetogenesis, propionogenesis, and sulfur-reducing was also noticed. Specifically, triticale straw with higher content of fiber, cellulose selectively enriched more lignocellulolytic taxa and electron transferring taxa, while brome hay with higher nitrogen content selectively enriched more families and genera for degradable substrates-digesting. Intriguingly, the carbohydrate-active enzyme profile suggested an over representation and diversity of putative glycoside hydrolases (GHs) in the animals fed on triticale straw. The majority of the cellulases belonged to fiver GH families (i.e., GH5, GH6, GH9, GH45, and GH48) and were primarily synthesized by Ruminococcus, Piromyces, Neocallimastix, and Fibrobacter. Abundance of major genes coding for hemicellulose digestion was higher than cellulose mainly including GH8, GH10, GH16, GH26, and GH30, and these enzymes were produced by members of the genera Fibrobacter, Ruminococcus, and Clostridium. Oligosaccharides were mainly of the GH1, GH2, GH3, and GH31 types and were associated with the genera Prevotella and Piromyces. Our results strengthen metatranscriptomic evidence in support of the understanding of the microbial community and plant polysaccharide response to changes in the feed type and host animal. The study also establishes these specific microbial consortia procured from triticale straw group can be used further for efficient plant biomass hydrolysis.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMany microbes have been individually characterized and functionally grouped into lignocellulolytic [8], electron transferring [9,10], proteolytic, amylolytic, lipolytic [11], and volatile fatty acid (VFA) producing subpopulation [12], which provided genetic information and fill the existing taxonomic information [9]

  • One animal was removed from trial due to an infection of the horn boss, Illumina generation sequencing led to the thorough elucidation of rumen microbial diversity and their functional capacity to hydrolyze lignocellulosic biomass in muskoxen rumen under different feeding scenario

  • The higher abundance of genes encoding putative GH5 family in this study indicates that rumen microbiome of muskoxen may comprise a unique approach for plant polycarbohydrate deconstruction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many microbes have been individually characterized and functionally grouped into lignocellulolytic [8], electron transferring [9,10], proteolytic, amylolytic, lipolytic [11], and volatile fatty acid (VFA) producing subpopulation [12], which provided genetic information and fill the existing taxonomic information [9] More important, these organisms produce a range of enzymes collectively known as glycoside hydrolase (GH). There are more attentions focused on herbivores in the Arctic aiming at exploring the microorganism reservoir in their rumen [15,16,17,18], for seeking novel microbes or mechanisms may involve in the bioconversion of high fiber forages into microbial biomass, energy, or biofuel. Studies have been conducted to investigate the microbiome of muskoxen, insights into the global microbial community and the effects of forage types on the rumen microbiome and glycoside hydrolase profile are still unavailable

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.