Characterization of forms of immunoreactive somatostatin in sensory neuron and normal and deafferented spinal cord

Abstract

In order to determine the contribution made by primary sensory afferents and supraspinal projections to the immunoreactive somatostatin (IRS) content of the spinal cord, measurements were made of the concentration of IRS in the dorsal and ventral halves of the cord in cats subjected to unilateral lumbosacral dorsal rhizotomy (L1-S3) alone or combined with spinal cord transection. The molecular forms of IRS (characterized by gel chromatography) in L7 lumbar spinal cord, L6-S1 dorsal roots, ventral roots and dorsal root ganglia, and sciatic nerve were also determined. S14 was the predominant form in all tissues examined, but two additional molecular forms corresponding to S28 and S11.5 kdalton were present in dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord; S28 but not S11.5 kdalton was detected in both dorsal roots and sciatic nerves. These results indicate that S14 and S28 and S28 are transported along the central and peripheral processes of dorsal root ganglia, but that spinal cord S11.5 kdalton originates in the central nervous system. IRS in the dorsal horn was reduced by ca. 40% following dorsal root section. Neither disruption of descending pathways by spinal transection nor surgical isolation of the lumbar segements lowered cord somatostatin content below that produced by dorsal root section, indicating that most of the somatostatin within the cord arises from the dorsal root and from neurons in local spinal segments. Although the total content of IRS in the dorsal horn was reduced by ca. 40% following dorsal rhizotomy, the pattern of molecular forms was not changed accordingly. Since S14 and S28 but not S11.5 kdalton are transported via the dorsal root, the dorsal root section would be predicted to produce a relatively greater decrease in S14 and S28 than in S11.5 kdalton. Therefore, failure to find a selective loss of S14 and S28 suggests that dorsal rhizotomy affects dorsal horn IRS content not only by removing afferent input but possibly also by modifyinh the processing of IRS by the remaining somatostatinergic neurons.