Abstract

Postweaning growth data on 282 steers and carcass data on 275 steers produced by artificially inseminating (AI) yearling heifers of 12 crossbred groups (Hereford-Angus reciprocal crosses plus F1 crosses produced by mating Jersey, South Devon, Simmental, Limousin and Charolais sires to Hereford and Angus cows) to Hereford, Angus, Brahman, Devon and Holstein bulls were analyzed. For postweaning growth rate, Devon-sired steers were the slowest, Holstein-sired steers were fastest and Hereford-Angus- and Brahman-sired steers were similar and intermediate. Due to their large weaning weights, Brahman-sired steers were heaviest at 452 days, followed closely by Holstein and then Hereford-Angus-AI (Hereford and Angus sires used by artificial insemination) and Devon. Steers from Jersey cross cows had the lowest average daily gain, relative growth rate and 452-day weight. Steers from the other crossbred cows group had similar postweaning growth rates, but due to weaning weight differences, Simmental, South Devon and Charolais crosses had similar 452-day weights that tended to be heavier than those of Hereford-Angus and Limousin crosses. Carcass traits were analyzed once with carcass weight as a covariate and once with slaughter age as a covariate. The analyses produced similar results. Carcasses from Holstein-sired steers had the least fat cover, smallest percentage of kidney, heart and pelvic fat (%KHP), best yield grade, highest estimated percentage retail product and lowest conformation score. Devon-sired steers had the highest %KHP fat. Brahman-sired steers had the poorest yield grade and the lowest marbling score and quality grade. Hereford and Angus-sired steers had the most fat cover, poorest yield grade and lowest estimated percentage retail product but highest conformation, marbling and quality scores. Steers from Hereford-Angus and Jersey cross cows had the most fat cover, smallest longissimus area, highest %KHP fat, lowest yield grade and lowest percentage retail product. Steers from Jersey crosses also had the lowest conformation scores. Most other differences among cow sire breeds for carcass traits were small.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.