Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of recurrent gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma after perioperative chemotherapy and radical resection

BackgroundThis study investigated the impact of perioperative systemic chemotherapy on the recurrence rate and pattern following resection of colorectal liver metastases.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in two centers. Rates and patterns of recurrence and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients treated with and without perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The clinical risk score (CRS) was used to stratify patients in low risk (CRS 0–2) and high risk (CRS 3–5) of recurrence.ResultsA total of 2020 patients were included, of whom 1442 (71%) received perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 88 months, and 1289 patients (64%) developed a recurrence. The recurrence pattern was independent of chemotherapy in low-risk patients: intrahepatic recurrences (30% vs. 30%, p = 0.97) and extrahepatic recurrences (38% vs. 39%, p = 0.52). In high-risk patients, no difference in intrahepatic recurrences was found (48% vs. 50%, p = 0.59). However, a lower rate of extrahepatic recurrences (43% vs. 55%, p = 0.007) was observed with perioperative systemic chemotherapy, mainly due to a reduction in pulmonary recurrences (25% vs. 35%, p = 0.007). In competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of extrahepatic recurrence was significantly lower with perioperative systemic chemotherapy in high-risk patients only (5-year cumulative incidence 44% vs. 59%, p < 0.001). Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in high-risk patients (adjusted HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57–0.94, p = 0.02), but not in low-risk patients (adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82–1.19, p = 0.90).ConclusionsPerioperative systemic chemotherapy had no association with intrahepatic recurrence, but was associated with fewer pulmonary recurrences and superior OS in high-risk patients only.

Relevance. Leiomyosarcomas is highly aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. Surgical resection is a standard treatment approach. However, data of long-term results of surgical treatment are lacking due to rarity of retroperitoneal form of leiomyosarcoma. Prognostic significance of tumor size, grade and recurrence type remains unclear as well. Aim. To analyze results of surgical treatment of patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and to define prognostic factors which are associated with disease-free and overall survival. Materials and methods. The study included patients with primary retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas who have received surgical or combined treatment between January 2003 and April 2019 at Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes of surgical and combined treatment as well as recurrence rate, pattern of recurrence and morphological features were analyzed in order to define prognostic factors of disease-free and overall survival. Results. The study included 64 patients with primary retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas 12 men (18%) and 52 women (82%). Median tumor size was 10.55.0 cm. Most of the operations (93.3%) were done by open approach. Combined resections were performed in 62.5% of cases (n=40), vascular resections in 17.2% cases (n=11). Radical (R0) resections were performed in 54 cases (85.9%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality rate were 39% and 0% respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy received 21 (35%) patients and 1 (1.7%) patient respectively. 46 (71.9%) patients had a disease recurrence. Recurrence type (local recurrence/distant metastases) did not influence overall survival (р=0.655). Median disease-free survival was 27 months (95% CI 1043.9). 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival was 43% and 21% respectively. Median overall survival was 79 months (95% CI 49108.9). 3-year and 5-year overall survival was 73% and 59% respectively. Among patients grade 2 and grade 3 tumors median disease-free survival was 49 vs. 18 months (р=0.271), median overall survival 146 vs. 58 months (р=0.018). There were no statistically significant differences in rate of radical resections among patients with different tumor location (р=0.804) or its size (р=0,520). Patients, who have undergone radical (R0) resection, had better overall (р=0.028) and disease-free survival (р0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated lower risk of disease recurrence (p=0.976), type of recurrence (р=0.981) and lower overall survival (р=0.284). Conclusion. Tumor grade and radical resection are the most important prognostic factors in patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. In our study, tumor size was not correlated with long-term results and possibility of radical resection.

There is scant evidence about optimal management of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder (BNEC). We performed a multicenter retrospective study on BNEC patients from 13 Italian neuroendocrine-dedicated centers to analyze strategies associated with better outcomes. Mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) were included. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in the overall cohort, relapse-free survival (RFS) in radically operated patients and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Fifty-one BNEC patients were included (male: 46, median age: 70 years). Overall, median OS was 16.0 months, radical tumor resection was performed in 37 patients (72.5%) and 11 of these (29.7%) also received peri-operative platinum-etoposide chemotherapy. Median OS was longer in patients with better performance status (PS) and in those with stage I–III disease at diagnosis compared to stage IV. Among patients who underwent radical tumor resection (N = 37), RFS was longer in patients with better PS and showed a trend towards a longer RFS in those treated with peri-operative chemotherapy than with surgery alone (11 vs. 6 months; p = 0.078). Among 28 patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic disease, PFS was 5.0 months and there was a trend towards improved PFS in patients receiving carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy compared to other regimens. A multivariate model unmasked a significant association between carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy and risk for disease progression or death (HR: 0.39 (95%CI: 0.16–0.96) p = 0.040). Performance status might be associated with improved RFS in radically operated patients, while type of chemotherapy might affect PFS in patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic BNEC.

Neoadjuvant treatment is considered the standard treatment for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. This study compared the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and perioperative chemotherapy (PCT) based on postoperative results and long-term survival. All patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were treated with a single protocol of neoadjuvant CRT (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] with 45Gy of concurrent radiotherapy) or with a single protocol of PCT (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU). The responses to CRT and PCT were evaluated by considering the rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and radical resection (R0). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence were evaluated according to the neoadjuvant treatment. A total of 116 patients underwent CRT or PCT followed by esophagectomy; 61 patients underwent PCT, and 55 patients underwent CRT. R0 was achieved in 98 patients (84.5%) and was more frequent in the CRT group (94.6 vs. 75.4%; p=0.010). pCR was observed in 13 patients (11.2%) and was more frequent in the CRT group (20 vs. 3.3%; p=0.011). OS was comparable between the CRT and PCT groups (41 vs. 45months; p=0.284). DFS was comparable between the CRT and PCT groups (21 vs. 36months; p=0.522). In this study, better histological results were observed in patients who had been treated with CRT, although similar survival rates were observed for patients treated with either CRT or PCT. Further study is necessary to select patients who will benefit most from CRT or PCT.

The prognostic meaning of weight loss (WL) during standard treatment for operable oesophagogastric cancer is still unclear. The aim of this study is to analyse the prognostic effect of WL during perioperative chemotherapy (PC) for gastric cancer (GC) and oesophageal adenocarcinomas (OAC). We retrospectively analysed data from 128 patients (pts) with GC and OAC who underwent surgery in the context of multimodal treatment with PC. We collected data on WL during different steps of therapy together with other histopathologic and demographic information. We analysed the effects on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Pts with WL ≥ 5% during neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited significantly worse OS compared with pts with WL < 5% (median OS: 23.6 months [95% CI: 4.4–42.9] vs. 63.5 months [95% CI: 50.7–76.2], p = 0.007) and DFS (median DFS: 12.5 months [95% CI: 2.9–22.1] vs. 63.5 months [95% CI: 31.6–95.4], p = 0.016). Pts with WL ≥ 14% during the whole treatment exhibited significantly worse OS compared with pts with WL < 14% (median OS: 43.7 months [95% CI: 13.2–74.2] vs. not reached, p = 0.028) and DFS (median DFS: 34.3 months [95% CI: 14.0–54.5] vs. not reached, p = 0.038). Conclusion: WL patterns during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and during the whole treatment correlate with a significantly worse prognosis in operated pts with curative GC or OAC in the context of a multimodal treatment with PC. A validation of this prognostic effect in prospective studies is warranted.

No consensus exists on the optimal therapy for resectable gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors, including the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy (PC). Our study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) outcomes associated with the recommended treatment modalities for GC and GEJ tumors and evaluate treatment trends from 2010 to 2020. A national registry cohort identified patients with ≥ cT2 nonmetastatic GC and GEJ cancer. Treatment modalities were classified as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCR), PC, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and adjuvant chemoradiation (ACR). Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated factors associated with OS. A cohort of 7665 patients were included. Patients who received PC had the highest OS (median 86.80 months, 95% CI 73.40-NE), while chemoradiotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings had worse OS than PC and NC (NCR median 47.15 months, 95% CI 44.58–52.27, and ACR median 52.67 months, 95%CI 42.78–63.93). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that NCR and NC had worse survival than PC (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.50–2.02, p < 0.001 and HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10–1.44, p = 0.0008, respectively). Additionally, the most utilized modality during 2020 was NC (35.8%), followed by PC (28.0%) and NCR (24.9%). The utilization of PC and NC had the most substantial rise between 2010 and 2020, increasing by 11.0%. The study demonstrates the association of PC with improved OS outcomes for nonmetastatic GC and GEJ tumors. Therapies combining radiation with chemotherapy and extended lymph node dissection correlated with a worse prognosis compared to PC and NC. Despite the association with improved outcomes, national data reveals low utilization rates for PC.

To compare the overall survival and disease-free survival rates with perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in operable gastric cancer cases. The retrospective, observational study was conducted at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised date from January 2015 to December 2020 of operable gastric cancer patients who had perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival and disease-free survival were evaluated. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Of the 108 patients in the aga range 27-80 years, 71(65.74%) were males. The overall median age was 49.50 years (interquartile range: 28 years). There were 69(63.88%) patients on perioperative and 39(36.12%) on adjuvant chemotherapy. The probability of 2- and 3-year overall survival was 68.20% and 57.32% in the perioperative group, and 51.09% and 45.43%, respectively, in the adjuvant group. The probability of 2- and 3-year disease-free survival was 55.45% and 49.30% in the perioperative group, while 2-year disease-free survival was 38.39% in the adjuvant group which had no patient reaching the 3-year mark. The median overall survival for the perioperative group was 49.29 months (interquartile range: 44.50 months) and for the adjuvant group it was 28.23 months (interquartile range: 25.00months) (p=0.07). The median disease-free survival was 35.46 months (interquartile range: 38.50 months) for the perioperative group and 10.19 months (interquartile range: 14.00months) for adjuvant group (p=0.16). The difference between the groups was not significant (p>0.05), but there was a trend suggestive of the superiority of perioperative chemotherapy over adjuvant chemotherapy. In operable gastric cancer cases, the difference between the groups was not significant, but there was a trend suggestive of the superiority of perioperative chemotherapy over adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to overall survival and disease-free survival.

4039 Background: Currently, the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) remains controversial. It is still inconclusive whether chemotherapy can be spared for dMMR/MSI-H GC patients. Meanwhile, in the different therapeutic settings (e.g. neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or both), the efficacy of chemotherapy remains to be clarified. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis in this regard was conducted. Methods: Studies comparing perioperative chemotherapy with surgery alone in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GCs (up to December 1, 2023) were included. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of survival outcomes were extracted from the original research or recalculated using Kaplan-Meier curves if the number of patients at risk was provided. In the pooled analysis, a random-effects model was employed. Subgroup analyses (perioperative chemotherapy in stage II and stage III diseases) and sensitivity analysis including studies reporting the results from multivariable analyses were conducted. This study was previously registered on PROSPERO platform (CRD42023494276). Results: Nineteen studies, encompassing over 1500 dMMR/MSI-H GC patients, were included in this study. The results revealed that perioperative chemotherapy (including neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy) did not significantly improve the overall survival (OS) (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57–1.31) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46–1.05) in dMMR/MSI-H GCs. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy did not confer a significant survival advantage for dMMR/MSI-H GCs (OS, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.50–1.37) and (DFS, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41–1.07). Similar results were observed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OS, HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.55–2.15). In addition, stage stratification analysis demonstrated no significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II (OS, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.31–1.90) or stage III (OS, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36–1.46) dMMR/MSI-H GCs. In the sensitivity analysis, the results remained consistent. Conclusions: Perioperative (including adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant) chemotherapy does not significantly improve survival in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC patients. Immunotherapy may be better suitable for these patients in the future.

Locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: Treatment sequences, intensification, and rectal organ preservation.

Background. How to assess cachexia is a barrier both in research and in clinical practice. This study examines the need for assessing both reduced food intake and loss of appetite, to see if these variables can be used interchangeably. A secondary aim is to assess the variance explained by food intake, appetite and weight loss by using tumor-related factors, symptoms and biological markers as explanatory variables. Material and methods. One thousand and seventy patients with incurable cancer were registered in an observational, cross sectional multicenter study. A total of 885 patients that had complete data on food intake (PG-SGA), appetite (EORTC QLQ-C30) and weight loss were included in the present analysis. The association between reduced food intake and appetite loss was assessed using Spearman's correlation. To find the explained variance of the three symptoms a multivariate analysis was performed. Results. The mean age was 62 years with a mean survival of 247 days and a mean Karnofsky performance status of 72. Thirteen percent of the patients who reported eating less than normal had good appetite and 25% who had unchanged or increased food intake had reduced appetite. Correlation between appetite loss and food intake was 0.50. Explained variance for the regression models was 44% for appetite loss, 27% for food intake and only 13% for weight loss. Conclusion. Both appetite loss and food intake should be assessed in cachectic patients since conscious control of eating may sometimes overcome appetite loss. The low explained variance for weight loss is probably caused by the need for more knowledge about metabolism and inflammation, and is consistent with the cancer cachexia definition that claims that in cachexia weight loss is not caused by reduced food intake alone. The questions concerning appetite loss from EORTC-QLQ C30 and food intake from PG-SGA seem practical and informative when dealing with advanced cancer patients.

SummaryBackgroundThe optimum curative approach to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction is unknown. We aimed to compare trimodality therapy (preoperative radiotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel [CROSS regimen]) with optimum contemporaneous perioperative chemotherapy regimens (epirubicin plus cisplatin or oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil or capecitabine [a modified MAGIC regimen] before 2018 and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel [FLOT] subsequently).MethodsNeo-AEGIS (CTRIAL-IE 10-14) was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 24 centres in Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older with clinical tumour stage T2–3, nodal stage N0–3, and M0 adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction were randomly assigned to perioperative chemotherapy (three preoperative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of intravenous 50 mg/m2 epirubicin on day 1 plus intravenous 60 mg/m2 cisplatin or intravenous 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 plus continuous infusion of 200 mg/m2 fluorouracil daily or oral 625 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily up to 2018, with four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of 2600 mg/m2 fluorouracil, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m2 leucovorin, and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel intravenously on day 1 as an option from 2018) or trimodality therapy (41·4 Gy in 23 fractions on days 1−5, 8−12, 15–19, 22–26, and 29–31 with intravenous area under the curve 2 mg/mL per min carboplatin plus intravenous 50 mg/m2 paclitaxel on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug, regardless of which study drug they received, by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival, site of treatment failure, operative complications, toxicity, pathological response (complete [ypT0N0] and major [tumour regression grade 1 and 2]), margin-free resection (R0), and health-related quality of life. Toxicity and safety data were analysed in the safety population, defined as patients who took at least one dose of study drug, according to treatment actually received. The initial power calculation was based on superiority of trimodality therapy (n=366 patients); it was adjusted after FLOT became an option to a non-inferiority design with a margin of 5% for perioperative chemotherapy (n=540). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01726452.FindingsBetween Jan 24, 2013, and Dec 23, 2020, 377 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 362 were included in the intention-to treat population (327 [90%] male and 360 [99%] White): 184 in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 178 in the trimodality therapy group. The trial closed prematurely in December, 2020, after the second interim futility analysis (143 deaths), on the basis of similar survival metrics and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. At a median follow-up of 38·8 months (IQR 16·3–55·1), median overall survival was 48·0 months (95% CI 33·6–64·8) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 49·2 months (34·8–74·4) in the trimodality therapy group (3-year overall survival 55% [95% CI 47–62] vs 57% [49–64]; hazard ratio 1·03 [95% CI 0·77–1·38]; log-rank p=0·82). Median disease-free survival was 32·4 months (95% CI 22·8–64·8) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 24·0 months (18·0–40·8) in the trimodality therapy group [hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·68–1·17]; log-rank p=0·41). The pattern of recurrence, locoregional or systemic, was not significantly different (odds ratio 1·35 [95% CI 0·63–2·91], p=0·44). Pathological complete response (odds ratio 0·33 [95% CI 0·14–0·81], p=0·012), major pathological response (0·21 [0·12–0·38], p<0·0001), and R0 rates (0·21 [0·08–0·53], p=0·0003) favoured trimodality therapy. The most common grade 3−4 adverse event was neutropenia (49 [27%] of 183 patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group vs 11 [6%] of 178 patients in the trimodality therapy group), followed by diarrhoea (20 [11%] vs none), and pulmonary embolism (ten [5%] vs nine [5%]). One (1%) patient in the perioperative chemotherapy group and three (2%) patients in the trimodality therapy group died from serious adverse events, two (one in each group) of which were possibly related to treatment. No differences were seen in operative mortality (five [3%] deaths in the perioperative chemotherapy group vs four [2%] in the trimodality therapy group), major morbidity, or in global health status at 1 and 3 years.InterpretationAlthough underpowered and incomplete, Neo-AEGIS provides the largest comprehensive randomised dataset for patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction treated with perioperative chemotherapy (predominantly the modified MAGIC regimen), and CROSS trimodality therapy, and reports similar 3-year survival and no major differences in operative and health-related quality of life outcomes. We suggest that these data support continued clinical equipoise.FundingHealth Research Board, Cancer Research UK, Irish Cancer Society, Oesophageal Cancer Fund, and French National Cancer Institute.

The benefits of surgical resection for patients with stage N2 limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) remain controversial. This retrospective study analyzed the survival and recurrence patterns of the patients diagnosed with pathological N2 (p-N2) LD-SCLC after radical resection. A total of 171 p-N2 LD-SCLC patients who underwent radical pulmonary resection and systematic lymphadenectomies at Shanghai Chest Hospital from July 2005 to June 2015 were enrolled. The influence of the mediastinal lymph node status (single or multiple nodes, single- or multiple-station) on the survival and recurrence patterns was retrospectively analyzed. The main recurrence sites were outside the chest cavity (54.8%) and hematogenous metastasis (67.4%). The bone and liver as initial recurrence sites had a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 13.100 months and 11.900 months, respectively. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of patients diagnosed with single and multiple p-N2 after surgery were 19.233 and 9.367 months (P = 0.001), and the median OS were 43.033 and 17.100 months (P < 0.001), respectively. In conclusion, recurrence occurred in the form of hematogenous metastasis mostly in the extra-thoracic part. Interestingly, patients diagnosed with single p-N2 benefited from radical resection. Surgery may be a treatment option regardless of the T stage if N2 SCLC with a single metastatic lymph node can be identified preoperatively.

BackgroundSurvival rates for upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer are poor since many are diagnosed at advanced stages. Fast track endoscopy has been introduced to prompt diagnosis for patients with alarm symptoms that could be indicative of upper GI cancer. However, these symptoms may represent benign conditions and little is known about the predictive values of alarm symptoms of upper GI cancer in the general population.MethodsThe study is a nationwide cohort study of 60,562 individuals aged 45 years or above randomly selected from the Danish general population. Participants were invited to complete a survey comprising of questions on several symptom experiences, including alarm symptoms for upper GI cancer within the past four weeks. The participants were asked about specific symptoms (repeated vomiting, difficulty swallowing, signs of upper GI bleeding or persistent and recent-onset abdominal pain) and non-specific symptoms (nausea, weight loss, loss of appetite, feeling unwell and tiredness).We obtained information on upper GI cancer diagnosed in a 12-month period after completing the questionnaire from the Danish Cancer Registry. We calculated positive predictive values and positive likelihood ratios for the association between alarm symptom and subsequent upper GI cancer.ResultsA total of 33,040 individuals above 45 years completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 54.6%. Respondents were fairly respresentative of the study sample. During the follow-up period, 18 people were diagnosed with upper GI cancer. The number of incident cancers was similar among eligible non-respondents. Two thirds of the respondents with an upper GI malignancy had experienced one or more alarm symptoms.The positive predictive value for being diagnosed with upper GI cancer after reporting a least one alarm symptom was 0.1% (95% CI:0.0–0.1%). The positive likelihood ratio was 4.4 for specific alarm symptoms and 1.1 for non-specific alarm symptoms.ConclusionsWe found that positive predictive values of alarm symptoms of upper GI cancer experienced in the general population are low. It is important knowledge that despite denoted alarm symptoms even patients with specific alarm symptoms of upper GI cancer have a low risk of being diagnosed with upper GI cancer.

7066 Background: In patients with resectable gastric cancer, the use of either perioperative chemotherapy (POC) or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are acceptable treatment options in addition to surgical resection. Both approaches improved overall survival (OS) compared to surgery alone. Randomized controlled trials comparing these two modalities are lacking. This study uses real-world data to compare the clinical outcomes of these two approaches. Methods: We identified gastric cancer patients in the NCDB who had definitive surgery between years 2004 and 2015. They were divided into two cohorts: POC and adjuvant CRT. We compared the OS and surgical outcomes in both groups. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model were used to estimate survival. Results: Of 75,654 patients who underwent definitive surgical resection, 1,920 had POC and 9,161 had adjuvant CRT. Median OS was 56 months with POC and 38.5 months with CRT. After adjusting for age, gender, race, insurance status, comorbidity index, and treatment facility, patients who received POC had an 18% reduction in all-cause mortality compared to those who received adjuvant CRT (p &lt;0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.74- 0.88). Although, 30- and 90-day mortality was slightly higher with POC compared to CRT (0.047 vs. 0.03%, p&lt;0.0001 and 1.46 vs. 0.45%, p&lt;0.0001 for 30 and 90 day mortality, respectively). Length of hospital stay for primary tumor resection was similar between the two groups; but the 30 day readmission rate after surgery was higher with CRT compared to POC (12.74 vs. 8.33%, p&lt;0.0001). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing definitive surgical resection for gastric cancer, our study shows an association between the use of POC (vs. adjuvant CRT) and improvement in OS. In the POC cohort, while there was a slight increase in postoperative mortality, this was surpassed by the benefit derived from use of POC, resulting in net improvement of survival. These interesting observations warrant confirmation in randomized clinical trials. [Table: see text]

Background: The vitality domain of intrinsic capacity (IC) represents the synthesis of biological interactions and metabolism. As part of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) program developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), vitality focuses on the nutritional status of older adults. The objective of this work was to describe the vitality domain of IC in community-dwelling older people and to examine the associations of the vitality components (appetite loss and weight loss) with the other IC domains assessed within the framework of ICOPE. Methods: Cross-sectional data were obtained between January 2020 and February 2022 through the INSPIRE-ICOPE-Care program, a real-life ICOPE implementation initiative developed in the Occitania region of France. Participants were men and women aged 60 and older, looking for primary care services within the French healthcare system. Results: Appetite loss was reported by 14.0% (2013) of the participants, and weight loss by 12.4% (1788). A total of 863 participants (6.01%) declaring weight loss also suffered from appetite loss. In total, 2910 participants (20.27%) screened positive for the domain of vitality. Appetite loss was significantly associated with positive screenings for the domains of cognition (OR = 2.14 [1.84;2.48]), vision (OR = 1.51 [1.28;1.79]), hearing (OR = 1.18 [1.01;1.37]), psychology (OR = 3.95 [3.46;4.52]), and locomotion ‘OR = 2.19 [1.91;2.51]). We found significant associations of weight loss with the IC domains of cognition (OR = 1.65 [1.42;1.93]), psychology (OR = 1.80 [1.56;2.07]), locomotion (OR = 1.64 [1.41;1.91]), vision (OR = 1.24 [1.04;1.47]), and hearing (OR = 1.32 [1.12;1.55]). People reporting simultaneous appetite and weight loss showed higher odds of screening positive for psychological (OR = 5.33 [4.53;6.27]) and locomotion impairments (OR = 3.38 [2.88;3.98]). Conclusions: Appetite and weight loss are common among older people and are related to other potential IC impairments, especially psychological and locomotion. Further studies are needed to explore the longitudinal associations of vitality with the incidence of clinically meaningful declines in the other IC domains.