Abstract

Patterns of distribution of morphology in the fossil record should be examined more rigorously to evaluate the relative effectiveness of alternative evolutionary models and to integrate the dimension of true evolutionary time more directly with evolutionary theory. Grant (1972) has discussed three main problems in the detection of character displacement: we must assume that sympatry followed allopatry, that the state in allopatry represents the static, pre-contact state, and that there are no other reasons accounting for differences within a species in allopatric and sympatric zones. These problems can be largely avoided with suitable paleoiitological data. In an example involving the coincident 10 million-year histories of two congeneric species of Devonian trilobites, the one known instance of sympatry reveals marked divergent shifts in one species and a “mixed” reaction of convergent, divergent, and neutral shifts in the other species. The characters undergoing these shifts are largely those which (i) serve as specific differentia , and (ii) show the most change within one of the species over its entire history. This suggests that character displacement may be simply a magnified microcosm of a general pattern of interaction between two species even when allopatric, provided that allopatry is sustained through competitive exclusion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.