Abstract
After Cuba, Uruguay is the first country that has adopted a legal regime which allows the abortion. The law is from November 2012 and has presented problems for its interpretation and implementation. Was a correct solution for Uruguay? Were not other alternatives more convenient to be tried before? The author exposes different measures to be taken, that can avoid the abortion from its roots, as well as the effect produced by permissive laws. He also presents the role to be accomplish by Criminal Law in relation with the subject, and if the Uruguayan law has created a new cause of justification, a new right, or a new cause of impunity The abortion can be considered a woman’s right? or should we talk about a family right? In the law, it is practically denied the participation of the father of the child, consequently it is transformed as a new instrument for family/domestic violence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
