Abstract

In considering formally structured ethics, particularly in an arena such as complex as “forensics” where lives may literally hang in the balance, the underlying principles must be clearly understood as they provide the critical underpinnings of the eventual system derived from the foundational elements. The naïve perception of ethics—that is a universal “right versus wrong”—presumes uniform building blocks, interchangeable across societies, cultures, professions, and individuals. Such a perspective disregards varied perspectives, philosophies, purposes, and structures. To attempt some uniformity in understanding, and hopefully in implementation, potentially misunderstood terms such as morals, ethics, and professionalism should be clearly defined. Likewise, the several components of the forensic “system” need to be identified and the roles of each individual understood. With an established basis and roles, the practitioners can proceed to conclusion. Since the outcome of the interworking of the various functional components produces a finished product, the ultimate result desired is in fact the most critical element—one should define an end to begin. The desired goal drives the process. In other words, the ends lead to the means; therefore, the ends are justified by the means. As such, a deconstruction from desired outcome to foundation may allow development of a useful and memorable script by which to perform.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.