Abstract
Natural disasters, or "Acts of God", according to conventional wisdom, are unpredictable and unpreventable, whereas human-made disasters, or "Acts of Man", are taken to be both predictable and preventable. Furthermore, "Acts of Man", are perceived as more catastrophic and destructive than "Acts of God". The fact is, these commonly accepted perceptions, along with our understanding of the relationship between "natural" and "human-made" disasters, deserve a critical re-evaluation. Many disasters, although triggered by natural events such as floods and earthquakes, are increasingly man-made, and hence are both predictable and preventable. Likewise, certain human-made disasters cannot be so easily classified as "predictable" or "preventable", due to certain factors that render human beings incapable of rationally assessing either the decisions they make, or the consequences of their actions. We shall address these questions in this opening chapter by looking at examples of "natural" and "human-made" disasters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.