Challenges and innovations in undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic – A systematic review

BONUS: the National Oncology Network for Students and Junior Doctors

Fixing the Primary Care Pipeline: The Role of Teaching Health Centers

A Role for Live-Animal Models in Undergraduate Surgical Education During the Cadaver Shortage.

COVID-19 Effects on Medical Education: A Viral Transfer of Knowledge to Radiation Oncology

Undergraduate medical education has changed markedly in the decades after mid-century. The basic medical sciences have been de-emphasized; clinical training in the specialties has replaced that in general medicine; and both types of training have been compressed to permit much of the fourth year to be used for electives. The patients used for teaching in the major teaching hospitals have become less typical of those found in community practice. Innovations in medical education have been successful only when they have been compatible with other interests of the faculty. As medicine and medical schools have changed, major differences of opinion have developed over the goals of undergraduate medical education. Practicing physicians have continued to believe that the fundamentals of clinical medicine should be emphasized. A survey in the 1970s of 903 physicians found that over 97 percent of them believed that each of the following was “a proper goal of medical school training:” “knowing enough medical facts;” “being skillful in medical diagnosis;” “making good treatment plans;” “understanding the doctor-patient relationship;” “understanding the extent to which emotional factors can affect physical illness;” “being able to keep up with new developments in medicine;” and being able to use and evaluate sources of medical information. Only 52 percent felt that “being able to carry out research” was a proper goal of medical school training. Medical students have also believed that undergraduate medical education should emphasize clinical training. Bloom asked students at one medical school in the early 1960s whether they would prefer to “work at some interesting research problem that does not involve any contact with patients,” or to “work directly with patients, even though tasks are relatively routine.” About 25 percent of the students in all four classes chose research, while 58 percent of the freshmen and 70 percent of the juniors and seniors chose patient care. The same study also asked students their criteria for ranking classmates “as medical students.” Clinical skills were the predominant criteria used by students, with “ability to carry out research” ranking far down on the list. Faculty members, on the other hand, have emphasized the basic and preliminary nature of undergraduate medical education.

BackgroundMedical leadership plays an increasing role already in early career stages. Undergraduate medical students in the transition to postgraduate education feel not well prepared for their leadership roles. While leadership curricula have been developed, instruments for students’ self-assessment of leadership competences as part of their professional development are still missing. The aim of our study was to develop a self-assessment scale for undergraduate medical students’ leadership competences.MethodsThe medical leadership competence scale (MeLeCoS) for undergraduate medical students was developed in twelve steps. For item generation, we employed the Medical Leadership Competence Framework (MLCF), which is also used as a framework for many leadership curricula and includes five leadership domains for three fields of education: undergraduate education, postgraduate education, and continuing practice. In a pretest, 67 items were tested with n = 88 undergraduate medical students. For content validation we performed group discussions with a total of 17 students. After item reduction a test-version with 45 items and a 5-point Likert scale (1: ‘never’, 2: ‘rarely’, 3: ‘sometimes’, 4: ‘often’, 5: ‘always’) was used in a test-sample of final-year students (n = 129). Descriptive statistics and factor analyses were performed.ResultsThe final version of the MeLeCoS includes 37 items and the scale’s Cronbach’s alpha was 0.87. Six factors could be identified and two of them, respectively, represent leadership aspects from the following three areas: (1) the medical students themselves, (2) the interrelation of the medical students with a healthcare organisation regarding general management and improvement, and (3) general leadership aspects of medical students within undergraduate medical studies and the healthcare system. The overall mean of the MeLeCoS was 3.50 ± 0.39. Factor 2 (‘Demonstrating responsible behaviour and shaping relations’) reached the highest mean (4,36 ± 0.37) and factor 5 (‘Promoting improvement and innovation in undergraduate medical education’ the lowest (1.91 ± 0.87).ConclusionsThe medical leadership competence self-assessment scale (MeLeCoS) is a reliable instrument for undergraduate medical students’ self-assessment of leadership competence with good content validity. It could be used for students’ self-reflection on leadership competences in addition to rater-based assessments in leadership curricula and for longitudinal development of students’ professional identity.

There has been exponential growth in technology use within the NHS, further accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, and video consultations, e-Consults and remote monitoring are now commonplace. However, undergraduate medical...

The University of Kansas School of Medicine.

Medical education shaped by the learning sciences can better serve medical students, residents, faculty, health care institutions, and patients. With increasing innovation in undergraduate and graduate medical education and more focused attention on educational principles and how people learn, this era of educational transformation offers promise. Principles manifest in "educational continuity" are informing changes in educational structures and venues and are enriching new discourse in educational pedagogy, assessment, and scholarship. The articles by Myhre and colleagues and Woloschuk and colleagues in this issue, along with mounting evidence preceding these works, should reassure that principle-driven innovation in medical education is not only possible but can be achieved safely. In this commentary, the authors draw from these works and the wider literature on longitudinal integrated educational design. They suggest that the confluences of movements for longitudinal integrated clerkships and entrustable professional activities open new possibilities for other educational and practice advancements in quality and safety. With the advent of competency-based education, explicit milestones, and improved assessment regimens, overseers will increasingly evaluate students, trainees, and other learners on their ability rather than relying solely on time spent in an activity. The authors suggest that, for such oversight to have the most value, assessors and learners need adequate oversight time, and redesign of educational models will serve this operational imperative. As education leaders are reassessing old medical school and training models, rotational blocks, and other barriers to progress, the authors explore the dynamic interplay between longitudinal integrated learning models and entrustment.

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Medical students graduate with the knowledge and skills to be undifferentiated general physicians. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OtoHNS) is an essential component of primary healthcare, but is disproportionately under-represented in undergraduate medical education (UME). Advances and innovations in educational technology may represent an exciting and creative solution to this important problem. Failure to meet this educational need will result in substantial downstream effects in primary healthcare delivery. The objectives of this study were to 1) demonstrate current deficits in OtoHNS teaching at the UME level; 2) develop, validate, and critically appraise educational innovations that may enrich OtoHNS teaching in medical school curricula; and 3) propose a process for standardization of learning objectives for OtoHNS in UME as it relates to development and deployment of such educational tools. A white paper, prepared as a Triological Society thesis, which consolidates a prospective 10-year investigation of the problem of and potential solutions for under-representation of OtoHNS in UME. Cited datasets include multicenter surveys, cohort studies, and prospective, randomized controlled trials. A series of published and unpublished data were synthesized that addresses the following: 1) the current state of OtoHNS teaching at the UME level with respect to content, volume, structure, and methods; and 2) educational innovations including e-learning and simulation with emphasis on validity and learning effectiveness. Educational innovations specific to postgraduate (residency) training were excluded. Data support the observation that there is uniformly disproportionate under-representation of OtoHNS within UME curricula. Medical school graduates, especially those pursuing primary care specialties, report poor overall comfort levels in managing OtoHNS problems. A series of novel teaching methods were developed and validated using e-learning and simulation. Selected technologies may have a role in medical student teaching. It has been shown that e-learning has limited value in teaching complex spatial anatomy to novice learners, but good value in teaching basic clinical knowledge and selected technical skills. The role of simulation as it pertains to the novice learner is evolving. Important factors to consider during development of these tools include: 1) knowledge base and learning style of the learner, 2) complexity and nature of the learning objectives, 3) understanding the features and limitations of different technological genres, and 4) a team approach to module development. There remains a role for traditional teaching paradigms such as lectures, labs, and standardized patients; however, the choice of instructional genre should be fundamentally tailored to the nature of the learning outcomes. Enriching OtoHNS teaching in medical school is essential optimize primary care delivered to patients. Although e-learning and simulation are broadly accepted and desirable by today's medical students, these technologies should be woven into the fabric of UME pedagogical principles judiciously, and only after empiric assessment. Foundational to the development and implementation of these technologies is the framework of standardized competency-based learning objectives, common to all graduating medical students. NA

Unprecedented Training: Experience of Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Evaluating the outcomes of undergraduate medical education

258EMF Students’ Perspectives of a First Year Firearm Injury Prevention, Risk Assessment and Counseling Curricular Intervention

Order entry, entrustable professional activity (EPA) 4, is one of several EPAs that residency program directors identify as a weakness for PGY 1 residents. A multispecialty survey of program directors indicated that only 69% of interns could be trusted to enter and discuss orders and prescriptions without supervision. To address this gap, we developed a formative workshop for fourth-year medical students. Prior to the start of their subinternships, 366 fourth-year medical students engaged in an order entry workshop. Students performed chart reviews on electronic standardized patients within an educational electronic health record (EHR), placed admission orders, customized order sets, responded to safety alerts, utilized decision support tools, and incorporated high-value care considerations. Students used expert-validated rubrics to assess the quality of their admission orders and participated in a facilitated group discussion on key learning points. Finally, students participated in order entry, with all orders requiring cosignature by a supervising physician, during their clinical rotations. Students reported their confidence with order entry before and after the workshop and after the clinical rotation. One hundred seventeen students completed the pre- and postworkshop surveys, and 99 went on to complete the postcourse evaluation. Students showed a statistically significant increase in their confidence level following the workshop. Order entry is a critical, complex skill that requires deliberate instruction. This curriculum, which leverages the features of an educational EHR, can facilitate instruction, practice, and confidence gains regarding order entry prior to further application of these skills in the clinical environment.