Abstract
Huntington disease (HD) is a progressive and devastating neurodegenerative disease caused by expansion of a glutamine-coding CAG tract in the huntingtin (HTT) gene above a critical threshold of ~ 35 repeats resulting in expression of mutant HTT (mHTT). A promising treatment approach being tested in clinical trials is HTT lowering, which aims to reduce levels of the mHTT protein. Target engagement of these therapies in the brain are inferred using antibody-based assays that measure mHTT levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). These levels are typically reported as the absolute concentration of mHTT concentration, derived from a standard curve generated using a single protein standard. However, patient biofluids are a complex milieu containing different mHTT protein species, suggesting that absolute quantitation is challenging. As a result, a single recombinant protein standard may not be sufficient to interpret assay signal as molar mHTT concentration. In this study, we used immunoprecipitation and flow cytometry (IP-FCM) to investigate different factors that influence mHTT detection assay signal. Our results show that HTT protein fragmentation, protein–protein interactions, affinity tag positioning, oligomerization and polyglutamine tract length affect assay signal intensity. These findings indicate that absolute HTT quantitation in heterogeneous biological samples is not possible with current technologies using a single standard protein. We also explore the binding specificity of the MW1 anti-polyglutamine antibody, commonly used in these assays as a mHTT-selective reagent and demonstrate that mHTT binding is preferred but not specific. Furthermore, we find that MW1 depletion of mHTT for quantitation of wildtype HTT is not only incomplete, leaving residual mHTT, but also non-specific, resulting in pull down of some wildtype HTT protein. Based on these observations, we recommend that mHTT detection assays report only relative mHTT quantitation using normalized arbitrary units of assay signal intensity, rather than molar concentrations, in the assessment of central nervous system HTT lowering in ongoing clinical and preclinical studies. Further, we recommend that MW1-depletion not be used as a method for quantifying wildtype HTT protein and that detergent be consistently added to samples during testing.
Published Version
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have