Abstract
In 1996, an international group of representatives from national archives and libraries, universities, industry, publishing offices, and other government and private sector organizations first articulated the need for certified Trustworthy Digital Repositories (TDRs). Henceforth, multiple standards for TDRs have developed worldwide and their reviewers provide third party audit of digital repositories. Even though hundreds of repositories are currently certified, we do not know if audit and certification of TDRs actually matters. For example, we do not know if digital repositories are actually better at preserving digital information after certification than they were before. Additionally, we do not know if TDRs preserve digital information better than their counterparts, although TDR standards definitely promulgate this assumption. One way of assessing whether audit and certification of TDRs matters is to study its impact on TDRs’ stakeholders (e.g., funders, data producers, data consumers). As an initial critical step forward, this study examines what certification-related information repositories actually include on their websites since repository websites provide a means of disseminating information. Using findings from a content analysis of 91 TDR-certified repository websites, this research examines: 1) written statements about TDR status, 2) the presence of TDR seals and their location, 3) whether the seals hyperlink to additional certification information, 4) the extent to which the certification process is explained, and 5) whether audit reports are shared. Nearly three-fourths of the repository websites provide TDR status statements and put seals in one or more places; nearly 60% post audit reports and link seals to additional certification information; and over one-third explain the certification process. Directions for future research and practical application of the results are discussed.
Highlights
A trustworthy digital repository (TDR) is “one whose mission is to provide reliable, long-term access to managed digital resources to its designated community, and in the future” [1, p. 5]
The CoreTrustSeal on the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) homepage hyperlinks to a data stewardship page stating that ICPSR is a CoreTrustSeal core certified repository
TDR standards are examples of frameworks for conceptualizing and framing digital preservation problems; “the frameworks are useful as tools only to the extent they help do the work” [34, p. 80]
Summary
A trustworthy digital repository (TDR) is “one whose mission is to provide reliable, long-term access to managed digital resources to its designated community, and in the future” [1, p. 5]. The net result of certification is that it provides external validation that repositories which claim to preserve and provide access to digital resources both and in the future are up to the challenge. All TDR standards include verbiage that touts the merits of certification to repositories’ various stakeholders (e.g., funders, data producers, depositors, and consumers). These standards promise that TDR certification will make repositories’ stakeholders more confident that the data they contain will be protected, properly managed, and available for future reuse. Little research examines what information, seals or otherwise, repositories use to communicate about their status as TDRs. Audit and certification: Origins and development. Waters and Garrett [2] first argued for audit and certification of Certification information on trustworthy digital repository websites
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
