CD52 signaling via macrophage Siglec-G represents a therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy.

SummaryM2-tumor-associated macrophages (M2-TAMs) in the tumor microenvironment represent a prognostic indicator for poor outcome in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Here we show that Prune-1 overexpression in human TNBC patients has positive correlation to lung metastasis and infiltrating M2-TAMs. Thus, we demonstrate that Prune-1 promotes lung metastasis in a genetically engineered mouse model of metastatic TNBC augmenting M2-polarization of TAMs within the tumor microenvironment. Thus, this occurs through TGF-β enhancement, IL-17F secretion, and extracellular vesicle protein content modulation.We also find murine inactivating gene variants in human TNBC patient cohorts that are involved in activation of the innate immune response, cell adhesion, apoptotic pathways, and DNA repair. Altogether, we indicate that the overexpression of Prune-1, IL-10, COL4A1, ILR1, and PDGFB, together with inactivating mutations of PDE9A, CD244, Sirpb1b, SV140, Iqca1, and PIP5K1B genes, might represent a route of metastatic lung dissemination that need future prognostic validations.

Chemoresistance and metastasis are the main causes of death in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients and have been linked to a subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) with self-renewal and tumor-initiating properties. We have previously demonstrated that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) promotes tumor relapse and metastasis through modulation of CSC self-renewal properties. Importantly, NOS inhibition with the pan-NOS inhibitor NG-monmethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) reduced tumor growth and CSC renewal and tumor-initiating capacity and improved chemosensitivity to docetaxel in mouse models of TNBC. Based on these findings, we are conducting an ongoing Phase Ib trial of proprietary L-NMMA plus docetaxel in refractory locally advanced or metastatic TNBC (NCT02834403). The primary endpoint will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the L-NMMA and docetaxel combination. The study will be conducted in two stages. Stage 1 will determine the MTD of L-NMMA when combined with 75 mg/m2 docetaxel, and stage 2 will determine the MTD of L-NMMA when combined with 60 mg/m2 docetaxel. Five dose levels of L-NMMA (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 mg/kg) will be investigated in stage 1, with 7.5 mg/kg as the starting dose. In stage 2, the starting dose of L-NMMA will be one dose level above the MTD determined in stage 1. As patients are accrued in both stages, a standard Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method approach will be used to determine L-NMMA escalation/de-escalation. L-NMMA (Days 1−5 of each cycle) and docetaxel (Day 1 of each cycle) will be administered for six 21-day cycles. The major inclusion criteria will be female patients with pathologically advanced (progressive disease or refractory to 3 cycles of standard chemotherapy) or metastatic (any line) TNBC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2, life expectancy ≥6 months, and adequate organ function. Major exclusion criteria include any cardiac history and pregnancy/breastfeeding. Correlative studies will include evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the L-NMMA and docetaxel combination and tissue and blood-based markers of treatment response. Notably, analysis of RPL39 and MLF2 in plasma cell-free DNA samples will be performed. We have previously identified these genes as part of a chemotherapy resistance signature derived from breast cancer patient biopsies and have found that they promote breast CSC self-renewal, treatment resistance, and lung metastasis through NOS upregulation. Study enrollment began in August 2016. Two patients have been enrolled; both patients received 7.5 mg/kg L-NMMA and 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and no dose-limiting toxicities have been observed to date. L-NMMA Plus Docetaxel for refractory TNBC Citation Format: Jenny Chang, Angel Rodriguez, Joe Ensor. Clinical phase Ib trial of L-NMMA plus docetaxel in the treatment of refractory locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT037. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT037

Although an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) is key for tumor progression, the molecular characteristics associated with the immunosuppressive TME remain unknown in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Our previous functional proteomic study of TNBC tumors identified that C-JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway-related molecules were enriched in a cluster associated with the inflammatory pathway. However, the role of the JNK pathway in the TNBC TME is still unclear. Transcriptomic analysis was conducted using The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets. The effect of JNK-IN-8, a covalent pan-JNK inhibitor, on TNBC tumor growth, lung metastasis, and the TME was measured in TNBC syngeneic mouse models (n = 13 per group). Tumor (n = 43) or serum (n = 46) samples from TNBC patients were analyzed using multiplex immunohistochemistry or Luminex assay. All statistical tests were 2-sided. CIBERSORT analysis revealed that TNBC patients with high phosphorylated JNK level (n = 47) had more regulatory T cell (Treg) infiltration than those with a low phosphorylated JNK level (n = 47) (P = .02). Inhibition of JNK signaling statistically significantly reduced tumor growth (P < .001) and tumor-infiltrating Tregs (P = .02) while increasing the infiltration of CD8+ T cells in TNBC mouse models through the reduction of C-C motif ligand 2 (CCL2). Tumor-associated macrophages were the predominant cells secreting CCL2, and inhibition of JNK signaling reduced CCL2 secretion of human primary macrophages. Moreover, in patients with TNBC (n = 43), those with high levels of CCL2+ tumor-associated macrophages had more Treg and less CD8+ T cell infiltration (P = .04), and the serum CCL2 level was associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.65, 95% confidence interval = 1.29 to 5.44, P = .008) in TNBC patients (n = 46). The JNK/C-JUN/CCL2 axis contributes to TNBC aggressiveness via forming an immunosuppressive TME and can offer novel therapeutic strategies for TNBC.

Background: Breast cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among Algerian women. To date, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) shows substantial overlap with basal type cancer and it is associated with aggressive tumor behavior, poor prognosis and BRCA1 mutations. In the present study, we screened for the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in a cohort of 169 TNBC patients using PCR-Sanger sequencing and NGS with a cancer panel of 30 hereditary cancer genes or BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test. Materials and Methods: 169 TNBC patients and their relatives were referred trough several public hospitals from six years (2013-2019). BRCA1 germline mutation was screened using PCR-Sanger sequencing in 66 TNBC patients with strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer and 103 sporadic TNBC patients including all exons where a mutation was previously found in Algerian population (exons 2, 3, 4, 10, 17 and 19). BRCA2 germline mutation was screened using PCR-Sanger sequencing in 24 TNBC patients with strong family history of breast cancer including all exons where a mutation was previously found in Algerian patients (exons 10 and 22). In addition, nine (9) TNBC patients with strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer were analyzed by NGS using BRCA1 and BRCA2 test or a cancer panel of 30 hereditary genes (Colors genomics). Results: The analysis of the genomic DNA samples of 169 TNBC patients revealed that 15 patients carried pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 gene and three patients carried pathogenic variants in BRCA2 gene (10.65%). Eight distinct germline mutations in BRCA1 have been detected in this study: c.83_84delTG, c.181T&amp;gt;G, c.798_799delTT, c.505C&amp;gt;T, c.923_924delGC, c.2125_2126insA, c.5257A&amp;gt;G and deletion of exon 15. Interestingly, the recurrent and specific mutation c.83_84delTG has been detected in 4 unrelated TNBC patients. The pathogenic variant c.2125_2126insA has been detected in three unrelated families and also in the first relatives of 2 patients. The rare likely pathogenic variant BRCA1 c.5257A&amp;gt;G/p.Arg1753Gly has been detected in young female TNBC patient. The Del exon 15 in BRCA1 has been detected in two unrelated patients. Three distinct germline mutations in BRCA2 have been detected in three TNBC patients: c.1813dupA, c.7654dupA and c.8485C&amp;gt;T. Interestingly, these three mutations are reported for the first time in Algerian population. The c.1813dupA and c.8485C&amp;gt;T pathogenic variants have been detected in two young female TNBC patients with a family history of male breast cancer. Conclusions: In the current study, we detected recurrent germline mutations in BRCA1 gene in early onset TNBC patients. BRCA2 pathogenic variants have also been detected in young female TNBC patients. TNBC immunophenotype should be considered as an additional criterion for genetic counselling and testing of BRCA genes in Algerian women with early onset breast cancer. Citation Format: Farid Cherbal, Chiraz Mehemmai, Hadjer Gaceb, Hassen Mahfouf, Kada Boualga. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutational spectrum in Algerian triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1451.

Background: triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with hereditary and environmental risk factors plus an overall worse prognosis compared to other Breast Cancer (BC) subtypes. While TNBC risk factors, prevalence, clinical characteristics and prognosis may vary throughout different populations, limited data on Latin American patients forces clinical decisions to be based predominantly on data coming from non-Hispanic women. To obtain local epidemiological information, regarding risk factors and clinical outcomes, we analysed the largest Chilean BC registry. Methods: we conducted a retrospective population-cohort study involving females with any stage TNBC, treated at a community hospital (mid-low income) and at an academic private hospital (high income), between the years 2010 and 2021. Risk factors, reason for consultation, clinical and pathological characteristics and prognosis were separately analysed for both TNBC and non-TNBC subgroups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival on TNBC patients. Results: From 5,806 patients, 647 (11.2%) were identified as TNBC. Compared to non-TNBC patients, women were younger (median age 55.2 vs. 57.2, p=0.0001), with 15.8% of TNBC patients having been diagnosed before the age of 40 compared to 9.6% in non-TNBC (p= 0.0001). TNBC had a significantly lower screen-detected cancer rate (14.5% vs. 31.6% p= 0.0001) and worse stage at diagnosis. No differences were seen between patients seen at a community hospital and private centre, for both TNBC rate and stage. Other risk factors such as parity, age at first gestation, menarche, hormone therapy replacement and obesity showed no significant differences between TNBC and no-TNBC patients (table 1). With a median follow up of 57 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) and BC specific death were significantly shorter for TNBC compared to non-TNBC (76.4% vs 88.1% and 78.9% vs 91.2%, respectively; p=0.0001) (table 2). In the multivariate analysis, TN subtype (HR=2.3, p=0.0001), stage (HR=2.05 for stage II vs stage I, HR=7.04 for stage III vs. stage I, p=0.0001), lower income (HR= 1.64, p=0.0001), and non-screened detected BC (HR=1.32, p=0.03) were all associated with worse overall survival (table 3). Conclusion: This is the first study focusing on TNBC characteristics in Chilean BC patients and to our knowledge, the largest performed in a Latin American population. We identified a lower proportion of TNBC patients when compared with data reported from other LA groups and worldwide, a very low screen detected cancer rate and as expected significantly lower TNBC survival rate compared to non-TNBC women. While TNBC patients were younger compared to the non-TNBC group, this age difference was marginal compared to other reported studies. Community hospital patients (with mid-low income) were associated with lower survival rates for both all-cause mortality and BC specific survival, regardless of a similar stage distribution at diagnosis. Reflecting an underlying interaction between social and biological factors that needs to be addressed. Table 1. Patient characteristics: Triple-negative versus noN-triple negative breast cancer BMI: Body mass index; FH: Family history * Difference is statistically significant. Table 2. Survival comparison in triple-negative versus non-triple negative breast cancer * Difference is statistically significant. Table 3. Cox Regression Multivariate analysis * Difference is statistically significant. Citation Format: Benjamin Walbaum, FRANCISCO ACEVEDO, Catherine Bauerle, Mauricio Camus, Manuel Manzor, Raul Martinez, Paulina Veglia, Marisel Navarro, Constanza Guerra, Francisco Dominguez, Tomas Merino, Lidia Medina, CÉSAR SÁNCHEZ. Real-world data of clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of Chilean triple-negative breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-19.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of estrogen receptor β (ERβ) in triple-negative and triple-positive breast cancer patients, and evaluate its utility as a prognostic factor. Between January 2000 and December 2010, primary tumor tissue samples were collected from 234 subjects, including 107 triple-negative and 127 triple-positive breast cancer patients. The samples were embedded in paraffin and immunohistochemical staining was conducted to determine the expression levels of ERβ. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze patient survival rates. ERβ expression was observed in 38/107 patients (35.5%) with triple-negative breast cancer and 63/127 patients (49.6%) with triple-positive breast cancer. The ERβ expression rate was significantly decreased in the patients with triple-negative breast cancer, as compared with those with triple-positive breast cancer (P=0.03). Analysis of the survival rates indicated that patients with triple-negative breast cancer and positive ERβ expression exhibited poor disease progression-free survival (DFS) compared with those with negative ERβ expression (P=0.021). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the DFS between the triple-positive breast cancer patients with positive and negative ERβ expression. Therefore, the expression of ERβ varies between triple-negative and triple-positive breast cancer patients. In addition, positive expression of ERβ indicates a poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients; however, this is not the case for triple-positive breast cancer patients.

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known for its aggressive behavior, poor prognosis and still remains as a difficult disease since treatment options are limited. Despite some success in PARP inhibition in BRCA gene mutation patients or platinating agents that may offer superior outcomes in a subset of TNBC patients (pts), currently, there are no targeted therapies for TNBC available. Specific biomarkers are urgently needed for developing effective treatments to predict which patients will respond to the given therapy. In this regard, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are discussed to be an ideal surrogate marker for individualized treatment options. Since TNBC is closely related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a stem cell phenotype and, in addition, androgen receptor (AR) expression has been detected in up to a third of TNBC pts, we here established a multi-marker gene panel for the characterization of CTCs in TNBC pts and compared these findings with CTC characteristics in non-TNBC pts. Methods: 2x5 ml blood of 30 TNBC pts before and/or after neoadjuvant therapy and 30 non- TNBC pts (E+/PR+: n=23; ER+/PR-: n=4; HER2+: n=1; HER2+/ER+: n=1; HER2+/ER+/PR+: n=1) before therapy were analyzed for CTCs applying positive immunomagnetic selection targeting EpCAM, EGFR and HER2 using the AdnaTest EMT-2/Stem Cell Select (QIAGEN Hannover GmbH, Germany). Subsequently, cDNA was gene specifically pre-amplified using TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix according to in house designed assays. Establishment of a 19 gene qPCR panel was performed for the markers PI3K, AKT2, ERCC1, Aurka, HER2, HER3, EGFR, ALK, AR (androgene receptor), BRCA1, c-KIT, c-MET, KRT5, mTOR, NOTCH1, PARP1, SRC1, CD45 (leucocyte control) and GAPDH (housekeeping gene) as well as an internal reference. The cutoff was calculated, taken the false positive rate in healthy donors into account and defined as Ct(cutoff)-Ct(sample)-[Ct(CD45cutoff)-Ct(CD45sample)]. Results: In general, the distribution of the markers across all patients was highly variable. However, different expression patterns were found when CTCs of TNBC pts were compared with those of non-TNBC pts. In TNBC pts, SRC1 was the gene that was predominantly expressed, followed by c-Kit, HER3, BRCA1 and AURKA expression, before as well as after therapy. Interestingly, AKT2, EGFR, ERCC1 and PARP1 expression could not be detected at any time point studied. In addition, ALK, AR, c-Met, HER2 and KRT5 were only detected before but not after therapy. All other genes were expressed below 15%. In contrast, in non-TNBC pts, AKT2 was the gene that was predominantly expressed, followed by c-MET, HER3 and PI3K whereas c-KIT, ERCC1, mTOR and NOTCH1 were never found. All other genes were expressed below 10%. Conclusion: We successfully established a gene panel for the detection of the heterogeneous CTC population and demonstrated that CTCs in TNBC pts and non-TNBC pts show different genetic profiles. Although these data have to be confirmed in a bigger patient cohort, the knowledge about the individual target gene expression profile might efficiently help to predict a personalized targeted therapy for these pts in the future. Citation Format: Bittner A-K, Hoffmann O, Hauch S, Kimmig R, Kasimir-Bauer S. Circulating tumor cells in triple-negative and non-triple negative breast cancer patients show different genetic profiles. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-05.

Here, we investigated the possible predictive value of stromal caveolin-1 (Cav-1) as a candidate biomarker for clinical outcome in triple negative (TN) breast cancer patients. A cohort of 85 TN breast cancer patients was available, with the necessary annotation and nearly 12 years of follow-up data. Our primary outcome of interest in this study was overall survival. Interestingly, TN patients with high-levels of stromal Cav-1, had a good clinical outcome, with >50% of the patients remaining alive during the follow-up period. In contrast, the median survival for TN patients with moderate stromal Cav-1 staining was 33.5 months. Similarly, the median survival for TN patients with absent stromal Cav-1 staining was 25.7 months. A comparison of 5-year survival rates yields a similar pattern. TN patients with high stromal Cav-1 had a good 5-year survival rate, with 75.5% of the patients remaining alive. In contrast, TN patients with moderate or absent stromal Cav-1 levels had progressively worse 5-year survival rates, with 40% and 9.4% of the patients remaining alive. In contrast, in a parallel analysis, the levels of tumor epithelial Cav-1 had no prognostic significance. As such, the prognostic value of Cav-1 immunostaining in TN breast cancer patients is compartment-specific, and selective for an absence of Cav-1 staining in the stromal fibroblast compartment. A recursive-partitioning algorithm was used to assess which factors are most predictive of overall survival in TN breast cancer patients. In this analysis, we included tumor size, histologic grade, whether the patient received surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, CK5/6, EGFR, p53 and Ki67 status, as well as the stromal Cav-1 score. This analysis indicated that stromal Cav-1 expression was the most important prognostic factor for overall survival in TN breast cancer. Virtually identical results were obtained with CK5/6 (+) and/or EGFR (+) TN breast cancer cases, demonstrating that a loss of stromal Cav-1 is also a strong prognostic factor for basal-like breast cancers. Our current findings may have important implications for the close monitoring and treatment stratification of TN and basal-like breast cancer patients.

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive form of breast cancer (BC) that is associated with poor prognosis, accounts for 10-15% of all BCs. Chemotherapy remains the standard of care (SOC) for advanced disease, with limited clinical benefit. Oncology clinical trials (CTs) are globally recommended and encouraged as the preferred treatment (tx) option for any cancer patient (pt). ‘TrialJectory’ (TJ) is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology that matches pts to oncology CTs. Here, we identified distinct characteristics of TNBC pts who signed up to the TJ platform compared to non-TNBC pts. Methods: Using AI and an unsupervised natural language processing approach, the TJ platform clinically matches pts to CTs. Matching is achieved by pt response to an online dynamic questionnaire (www.trialjectory.com) that collects detailed clinical data including clinico-pathologic characteristics, tx history, general health, and comorbidities. Those are compared to the eligibility criteria of available CTs to yield a high-quality actionable matched-trial list. Results: Between 1/2020 and 12/2021, out of 9796 BC pts that signed up, 2688 were TNBC pts (27%). There was no significant difference in age at sign-up between TNBC and non-TNBC patients (median age of 57 years vs 58 years, respectively). Consistently with Non-hispanic black (NHB) race prevalence in the different molecular subtypes in the general US population, NHB race had higher signup rate in TNBC compared to non-TNBC (9.95% vs 5.76%, respectively). TNBC pts signed up at a later disease stage compared to non-TNBC pts (19% of TNBC reported having a stage 1 disease compared to 27% of non-TNBC pts, p&amp;lt; 0.001).A significantly higher percentage of pts with advanced/metastatic TNBC signed up to the TJ platform before starting tx compared to non-TNBC patients (34% vs 22%, respectively, p&amp;lt; 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the willingness to travel any distance within the US for a matched clinical trial between TNBC and non-TNBC pts (39% vs 34%, respectively, p&amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, we found significant differences in the characteristics of TNBC vs non-TNBC pts that have signed up to the TJ platform. There was an up to 2-fold enrichment of TNBC on the TJ platform pts compared to their frequency in the general population. While previous studies do not show a difference in stage distribution between different subtypes, TNBC patients initiated their search for CTs at a higher stage. In addition, advanced TNBC patients started their search earlier in their journey, before starting chemotherapy. This may reflect the lack of effective SOC and possibly, the motivation to avoid the use of chemotherapy. This is also supported by the willingness of TNBC patients to travel farther in order to identify and enroll in a CT compared to non-TNBC pts. Importantly, the motivation of TNBC pts to travel any distance has not been reduced despite the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a strong drive of this pt population to enroll in CTs. It also demonstrates that with the right access, diverse patient populations are willing to participate in clinical trials. In sum, TNBC pts are more likely to explore CT options, in the advanced stage setting, earlier in their journey. This study demonstrates the power of TJ platform for clinico-pathologic characterization and diverse pt groups, including their drivers and behavioral choices during their battle with cancer. Citation Format: Michal Safran, Yelena Lapidot, Tzvia Bader, Avital Gaziel. Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) patients are more likely to digitally explore clinical trial options and prior to receiving treatment for advanced disease compared to non-TNBC patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-05.

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to investigate whether the androgen receptor (AR) status affects the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, and to elucidate the predictive biomarkers and mutations associated with pathological complete response (pCR) in AR-positive TNBC patients.MethodsThe current retrospective cohort included 226 TNBC patients who underwent NACT. AR and FOXC1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry on pretreatment biopsy specimens of 226 TNBC patients from 2018 to 2022. The clinicopathological features of AR-negative, AR < 10%, and AR ≥ 10% TNBC patients were analyzed to confirm the appropriate threshold. The response was evaluated in terms of pCR and Miller-Payne (MP) grade in the subsequent mastectomy or breast conservation samples. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was utilized to further investigate the molecular characteristics of 44 AR-positive TNBC patients.ResultsAmong the 226 TNBC patients, compared with AR-negative and AR < 10% tumors (68.58%, 155/226), AR ≥ 10% TNBC patients (31.41%, 71/226) exhibited distinct clinicopathological features, while no significant difference was detected between those with AR-negative tumors and those with AR < 10% tumors. Thus, tumors with AR ≥ 10% expression were defined as having AR positive expression. The pCR rate of AR-positive TNBCs was lower than that of AR-negative TNBC patients (12.68% vs. 34.19%, p < 0.001). In TNBC, multivariate analysis demonstrated that FOXC1 was an independent predictor of pCR (p = 0.042), whereas AR was not. The pCR rate was higher in FOXC1 positive patients than in FOXC1 negative patients (34.44% vs. 3.13%, p < 0.001). In the AR-positive TNBC subgroup, patients with FOXC1 expression had lower AR expression, higher Ki-67 expression, and higher histological grade. Compared with AR-positive TNBC patients who achieved pCR, the non-pCR patients had a greater percentage of mutations in genes involved in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.ConclusionsThe current study indicated that the AR-positive TNBC is correlated with lower rates of pCR after NACT. The expression of FOXC1 in TNBC patients and AR-positive TNBC patients could be utilized as a predictive marker for the efficacy of NACT. The present study provides a rationale for treating these non-pCR AR-positive TNBC tumors with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors.

e12017 Background: Cancer antigen 15–3 (CA 15–3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), are often used in follow up care of breast cancer and provide important clues to the clinicians for disease progression in metastatic and recurrent breast cancer. Triple-negative breast cancers are frequently defined as a single group identifiable using routine clinical tests. They are negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), the so-called triple-negative breast cancers. In this study we compared the tumor markers of triple negative breast cancer and non-triple negative patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed serum CEA and CA 15–3 levels of both triple negative and non-triple negative breast cancer patients at the time of first diagnosis and when they developed metastatic disease. Results: 544 consecutive nonmetastatic breast cancer patients presenting at Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey, with a median age of 49 were evaluated. 15.1% of the patients were triple negative breast cancer. At the time of diagnosis triple negative group had lower serum CEA (2.5 ± 5.9 vs 4.0 ±16.4 p = 0.35) and CA 15–3 (23.7 ± 14.6 vs 37.1 ± 117; p = 0.021) levels compared to non-triple negative group. In patients who developed metastasis during follow up; the CEA (3.2 ± 3.8 vs 29.6 ± 106.4 p = 0.022) and CA15–3 (46.9 ± 46.3 vs 203.2 ± 534 p = 0.008) levels were also significantly lower in triple negative breast cancer group compared to non-triple negative group.In non-triple negative breast cancer patients who developed metastasis, mean serum levels of CEA and CA15–3 significantly increased compared to baseline, whereas in triple negative group who developed metastasis CEA and CA 15–3 levels did not differ significantly. Conclusions: While being a good laboratory parameter in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer metastases, tumor markers may not show the increased tumor burden in the triple-negative breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Purpose: Based on clinical and molecular data, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Breast cancers that have no expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are defined as triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs); luminal cancers have different expressions of ER, PR and/or HER2. TNBCs are frequently linked with advanced disease, poor prognosis and occurrence in young African women, and about 15% of the cases are associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Since radiotherapy is utilized as a principle treatment in the management of TNBC, we aimed to investigate the chromosomal instability and radiosensitivity of lymphocytes in TNBC patients compared to luminal breast cancer patients and healthy controls using the micronucleus (MN) assay. The effect of mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes on chromosomal radiosensitivity was also evaluated.Methods: Chromosomal radiosensitivity was evaluated in the G0 (83 patients and 90 controls) and S/G2 (34 patients and 17 controls) phase of the cell cycle by exposing blood samples from all patients and controls to 2 and 4 Gy ionizing radiation (IR).Results: In the G0 MN assay, the combined cohort of all breast cancer, TNBC and luminal patients’ exhibit significantly elevated spontaneous MN values compared to controls indicating chromosomal instability. Chromosomal radiosensitivity is also significantly elevated in the combined cohort of all breast cancer patients compared to controls. The TNBC patients, however, do not exhibit enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity. Similarly, in the S/G2 phase, 76% of TNBC patients do not show enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity compared to the controls. In both the G0 and S/G2 phase, luminal breast cancer patients demonstrate a shift toward chromosomal radiosensitivity compared to TNBC patients and controls.Conclusions: The observations of the MN assay suggest increased chromosomal instability and chromosomal radiosensitivity in South African breast cancer patients. However, in TNBC patients, the irradiated MN values are not elevated. Our results suggest that the healthy lymphocytes in TNBC patients could handle higher doses of IR.

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancer cases, with the worst outcome of all subtypes. For TNBC, still lacking targeted therapies, the only therapeutic option is currently chemotherapy, and despite a good initial response, patients often develop drug resistance. MiRNAs can modulate chemoresistance by affecting DNA repair, cell cycle progression, apoptosis and also tumor microenvironment. Macrophages constitute a major component of the immune microenvironment of cancer and pro-tumor M2 macrophages have been associated with resistance to chemotherapeutic treatments. Our previous data showed that miR-302b over-expression enhances sensitivity to cisplatin in breast cancer cell lines by targeting directly E2F1 and indirectly ATM. Here, we investigated the potential of miR-302b as a therapeutic tool to enhance cisplatin response in a TNBC mouse model and which pathways are involved in this mechanism both in tumor cells and microenvironment. Moreover, miR-302b prognostic value was assessed in a cohort of TNBC patients with available clinical outcome . Finally, we evaluated if miR-302b enhances the sensitivity to doxorubicin, another chemotherapeutic agent used as first-line therapy in TNBC patients. Material and method: MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells were injected into the mammary fat pad of female SCID mice and then treated with lipid nanoparticles containing miR-302b or cel-miR-67 control, alone or in combination with cisplatin. Gene expression profile on collected tumors was performed by microarray and tumor sections were stained with anti-arginase 1 (M2 marker) to evaluate the number of M2 macrophages. MiR-302b expression was assessed in 39 TNBC treated with chemotherapy in adjuvant setting, and associated with prognosis. Finally, MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with miR-302b precursor or control treated with doxorubicin for 24h and then assessed for cell viability. Results: Our results show that miR-302b combination with cisplatin significantly impaired tumor growth in comparison with cel-67 control and cisplatin (p= 0.03), and reduced the number of M2 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment (p=0.005). Moreover, gene expression profile of collected tumors confirm immune system modulation. Notably, miR-302b expression was associated with disease-free survival and overall survival in TNBC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, we found that miR-302b also enhances sensitivity to doxorubicin in vitro, affecting cell viability and cell cycle transition through E2F1 regulation. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that miR-302b can be exploited as a new therapeutic tool to improve the response to chemotherapy, modulating tumor microenvironment. Moreover, this miRNA has prognostic significance in TNBC patients, and might also represent an useful predictive biomarker for response to chemotherapy. Citation Format: Alessandra Cataldo, Ilaria Plantamura, Elvira D'Ippolito, Sandra Romero-Cordoba, Sara Baroni, Valeria Cancilia, Claudio Tripodo, Dario Palmieri, Marilena V. Iorio. miR-302b as adjuvant therapeutic tool to improve chemotherapy efficacy in human triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5437. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5437

e13064 Background: Triple-Negative Breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive form of breast cancer, characterized by the lack of expression of Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), and Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 (HER-2). Patients with TNBC do not benefit from hormonal or Trastuzumab therapy due to the lack of appropriate targets for these drugs. The current retrospective multicentric hospital-based study at HCG, India, aims to analyze the available treatment paradigms in TNBC patients in real-world evidence. Methods: Data from 3180 female breast cancer patients was collected and compiled from various medical records department (MRD) and hospital database from three HCG centers. The data comprised demographic and clinicopathological details, treatment details and survival information. In addition, the clinical and pathological parameters and survival outcomes were compared between TNBC and non-TNBC patients. Results: About 22.92% (729/3180) patients had TNBC, and 77.08% (2451/3180) patients had designated as non-TNBC. In the TNBC subgroup, 22.36% (163/729) patients belonged to the younger age group (&lt; 40 years), 65.98% (481/729) patients were in the 41-65 age group, while 11.66% (85/729) patients were &gt; 65 years old. Whereas the age-wise distribution in the non-TNBC group was as follows: &lt; 40 years- 15.46% (379/2451) patients, 41-65 years- 70.34% (1724/2451) patients, and &gt; 65 years- 14.2% (348/2451) patients. In the present cohort, TNBC and non-TNBC groups' mean age was 51.06 ± 12.15 years and 53.29 ± 11.55 years, with no statistical significance. About 11.8% (86/729) of patients in the TNBC group and 10.4% (255/2451) of patients in the non-TNBC group opted for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. About 32.37% of patients in TNBC and 37.45% of patients in the non-TNBC group underwent surgery. The 5-year OS was 68.58% and 83.41% for TNBC and non-TNBC patients, respectively, with a median 5-year survival of 2.13 years (95% CI 2.528-3.204) for TNBC patients whereas 5-year median survival of 2.096 (95% CI 1.36-4.368). The mean survival in TNBC patients &lt; 40 years was 10.14 years, which was significantly lower when compared to patients in the 41-65 years (14.12 years) and &gt; 65 years (19.45 years). Also, patients in the TNBC group who underwent surgery had a higher mean survival of 16.72 years than those who did not opt for surgery (14.49 years). Further, chemotherapy and radiotherapy also increased the life expectancy in patients in both the TNBC and non-TNBC groups. Conclusions: In the present study cohort, TNBC distribution in the at the HCG center in the Indian subcontinent is similar to that of the western population (23% in the US and the UK). Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were significantly higher among TNBC cases than non-TNBC cases. Lack of patient consent or proper patient follow-up further reduces survival

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive variant of breast cancer that lacks the expression of estrogen, progesterone, and human epithelial growth factor receptors. Due to the scarce availability of receptor‐targeted or hormonal treatments, TNBC patients are submitted to taxane‐based chemotherapies like paclitaxel. Patients initially respond to paclitaxel, but 4 out of 10 patients may develop tumor recurrence along with high metastasis and mortality rates. Several studies demonstrate that paclitaxel may induce chemoresistance and metastasis through the activation of Toll‐Like Receptor 4 (TLR4)/NFKB signaling pathway, a known cancer prognostic marker in breast cancer. Hence, new treatments are needed to improve TNBC prognosis in patients. Recently, our laboratory and collaborators developed MBQ‐167, a potent Rac and Cdc42 inhibitor that decreases tumor burden, cell proliferation, and metastasis in TNBC mouse models. In preliminary studies with TNBC mice, we observed that MBQ‐167/Paclitaxel combination treatment prevented metastasis progression compared to paclitaxel treatment alone. This led us to hypothesize that MBQ‐167 chemosensitizes aggressive breast cancer cells and reduces metastasis by blocking Rac/Cdc4, hence decreasing their downstream target NfkB activity. This research project aims to evaluate cellular and molecular events that explain how MBQ‐167 prevents paclitaxel‐induced metastasis. Here, we generated TLR4‐knockdowns (TLR4‐KD) in MDA‐MB‐231 TNBC cell lines using lentiviral particles with shRNAs against the TLR4 mRNA. After knockdown validation with western blot analysis (WB), Wildtype (MDA‐MB‐231), Scramble control knockdowns (Sc‐KD), and TLR4‐KD cells were treated with different concentrations of MBQ‐167, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, or combinations. After treatments, we evaluated the effect on cell viability from MTT assays at 96 and 120 hours, cell apoptosis through Caspase‐Glo 3/7 Assays at 48 hours, and cellular migration through scratch wound healing assays. Our results demonstrate that partial inhibition of TLR4 decreases the cell viability of cells, increases apoptosis, and decreases cell migration after treatment with MBQ‐167 (250 nM and 500 nM), Paclitaxel (5 nM and 10 nM), or Doxorubicin (250 nM and 500 nM). We also observed an additive response upon combinatorial treatments with MBQ‐167/Paclitaxel and MBQ‐167/Doxorubicin when TLR4‐KD cells were compared to wild‐type and Sc‐KD cells. Altogether, these results suggest that TLR4‐KD chemosensitizes cells to Paclitaxel and Doxorubicin chemotherapies. In addition, TLR4 inhibition improves cellular response to Rac/Cdc42 inhibitor, MBQ‐167. Therefore, TLR4‐KD may reduce Rac and NfkB signaling, improving treatment response to MBQ‐167, MBQ‐167/Paclitaxel, and MBQ‐167/Doxorubicin. Other cellular studies, including Rac and NfkB activation assays, are being evaluated in our laboratory.