Abstract

In the last decades, considerable work has been done regarding service life prediction of buildings and building components. Academics and members of the CIB W080 commission, as well as of ISO TC 59/SC14, have made several efforts in this area and created a general terminology for the concept of service life, which is extremely relevant for property management, life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costs (LCC) analyses. Various definitions can be found in the literature that share common ideas. In fact, there are different criteria that trigger the end of a building’s service life, but the trap that building practitioners too often fall into and that should be avoided is dividing a problem into separate boxes, labels, and specializations without the mutual cohesion and interaction, and ignoring human behavior. Some definitions of service life are discussed in this review paper, in which the cause-effect processes underlying aging and decay are described. These descriptions highlight the continuous interrelation between different criteria for the end of a building’s service life, considering too often neglected and misunderstood causes of the end of life.

Highlights

  • Like humans, buildings and their components are “born”, “get older” and “die” [1]

  • Service life data have mostly been used in research fields that include property management [4], life cycle analysis (LCA), and life cycle cost analysis (LCC)

  • This review presents different perspectives regarding the concept of service life and obsolescence and the criteria that trigger the need for maintenance, repair, or replacement of a building and its components

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Buildings and their components are “born”, “get older” and “die” [1]. Several studies and methodologies have been developed regarding service life prediction of buildings and components These studies have arisen from the need for reliable knowledge about the durability of building elements so that more sustainable strategies can be adopted regarding maintenance activities and the management of a building’s life cycle. LCA and LCC results are strongly dependent on assumptions regarding the service life of buildings and their components. The concepts and terminology in service life prediction present some variations, with different meanings and connotations, depending on the scope of the different studies carried out. This review presents different perspectives regarding the concept of service life and obsolescence and the criteria that trigger the need for maintenance, repair, or replacement of a building and its components.

Service Life and Obsolescence
Serviceability and Functionality
Cause-Effect Dimensions of Obsolescence
End of Service Life Triggered by Functional and Technological Demands
End of Service Life Triggered by Social or Community Motivations
End of Service Life Triggered by Aesthetics or Architectural Trends
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.