Case report of seminal vesicle schwannoma with synchronous prostate cancer

There is a lack of comprehensive reports on time trends in synchronous prostate and rectal cancers. To address this, we conducted the largest cohort study to date to assess these trends in a population-based setting. We included all adult (ages 18-99) men with incident prostate cancer in the Swedish Cancer Register in 1993-2019. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of prostate cancer per 100,000 male population per year were calculated and compared to the ASIR of synchronous (± 6 months from rectal cancer diagnosis) prostate cancer. Age-adjusted synchronous-to-general incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were predicted using Poisson regression. As a sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of incidental findings due to the anatomical proximity, we investigated synchronous prostate and non-sigmoid colon cancers. Among 238,252 prostate cancer cases, 594 were synchronous with rectal cancer. The incidence of synchronous prostate cancer increased over the study period, with mean ASIR rising from 418/100,000 (1993-2001) to 788/100,000 (year 2011-2019). The synchronous-to-general IRR increased from 1.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60-2.31) to 2.61 (95% CI 2.32-2.95) over the same periods. Prostate cancer was also more commonly diagnosed in conjunction with non-sigmoid colon cancer than in the overall male population, but no time trend was observed. The incidence of synchronous prostate and rectal cancers has increased over the past 20 years in Sweden, with no signs of plateauing. Future studies are warranted to explore factors contributing to prostate cancer overdiagnosis and to optimize clinical management strategies for this complex patient group.

Nowadays, the diagnosis of synchronous and metachronous malignancies are increasing due to extended lifetime expectancy and advances in cancer diagnosis and therapy. When simultaneously multiple primary tumors are detected, treatment priority is determined according to the severity of each tumor. Synchronous primary prostate and lung cancer is rare. Herein, a case with synchronous prostate and lung cancer is presented.

Anti-tubulin couplets have activity in hormone-resistant prostate cancer. This study was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of the unique triplet combination of paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinorelbine (Pacl-E-Vin). Patients with advanced malignancies who had failed standard therapy, ECOG performance status (PS 0-2) and adequate organ function were included. Dose of EMP was fixed at 300 mg/m2/dose p.o. t.i.d. on days 1-3 and 8-10. Vinorelbine dose was 20 mg/m2/day i.v. on days 3 and 10. Paclitaxel was dose escalated from 40 to 50 mg/m /day i.v. on days 3 and 10. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Twelve adults (median age 72) were entered on this study. Primary tumors included prostate (n=7), cervix (n=2), melanoma (n=1), colon (1) and lung with synchronous prostate cancer (n=1). Nine patients had received no prior chemotherapy, one had received a prior regimen and two had received two or more prior regimens. Of four evaluable patients at dose level 1, one patient had grade 3 neutropenia leading to the day 10 dose being withheld. Of five evaluable patients at dose level 2, there was one DLT (febrile neutropenia) and two grade 3 neutropenias leading to the day 10 dose being withheld. One patient had a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Other side effects were mild and reversible. Nine patients were evaluable for efficacy: three with prostate cancer had a greater than 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and a patient with synchronous prostate and lung cancer had a greater than 50% PSA response. We conclude that the DLT of Pacl-E-Vin is neutropenia. RPTD is vinorelbine 20 mg/m2, paclitaxel 40 mg/m2, both administered on days 3 and 10, and EMP 900 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and 8-10, q3w. Dose omission at day 10 followed by 20% dose reduction of paclitaxel and vinorelbine is recommended in the event of grade 3 neutropenia. Activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer is promising and warrants phase II evaluation.

33 Background: Synchronous prostate cancer (PC) and rectosigmoid (RS) cancer (RSC) is a challenging clinical situation. Methods: A retrospective review of Duke University and Durham VA charts was performed for men with adenocarcinomas of the prostate and RS colon from 1988-2017. Synchronous presentation was defined as symptoms, diagnosis (dx), or treatment (tx) of PC/RSC within 12 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), calculated from latest dx date. Univariate and multivariate (MVA) Cox regression was performed using STATA 15.1. Results: Among 31,883 men with PC identified, 330 (1%) also had RSC. 54 (16%) were considered synchronous (median age 67, IQR 62-72). PC was more commonly the first dx (59%), and 15 (28%) underwent prostatectomy (n=13) or radiotherapy (RT, n=2) before a dx of synchronous RSC. 26%, 57%, and 17% had stage I, II-III, and IV RSC, respectively. Prostatectomy, LAR, APR, and combined surgery for both PC/RSC was performed in 17 (31%), 24 (44%), 10 (19%), and 2 (4%) men, respectively. 35 (65%) received RT with median RS dose of 50.4 Gy (IQR 50.4-54 Gy) and prostate boost to 66 Gy (IQR 61-72 Gy). 34 (63%) received 5-FU based chemotherapy, 23 (43%) received ADT, and 9 (17%) received no PC-specific tx. After a median follow up of 43 (IQR 21-93) months, there were 34 deaths: 18 (53%) due to RSC, 2 (6%) due to PC, 3 (9%) due to grade 5 toxicity, 7 (21%) due to another malignancy, and 4 (12%) due to unknown cause without recurrence. Grade 5 toxicities resulted from sequential hepatectomy/LAR, combined prostatectomy/APR, and myocardial infarction while on ADT. Crude late grade ≥3 toxicities include 9 (17%) GI and 6 (11%) GU. Two anastomotic leaks <2.3 years after LAR occurred in men who received neoadjuvant prostate RT boost of 70.6-76.4 Gy. Stages II-III (HR 4.3, p=0.02) and IV (HR 16, p<0.01) for RSC but only stage IV (HR 31, p<0.01) for PC were significantly associated with OS on MVA. Among 30 men with stage II-III RSC and non-metastatic PC, 5-FU based chemotherapy (HR 0.34, p=0.04) but no PC-specific tx was significantly associated with OS on MVA. Conclusions: Synchronous RSC is a greater contributor to mortality than PC. Men aged ≥50 with localized PC should undergo colorectal cancer screening prior to tx to evaluate for synchronous RSC.

Synchronous occurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is uncommon. RCC has a higher tendency to metastasize to the adrenal glands, renal hilar, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes compared to PCa. To date, there are no documented cases existing where metastatic tumors in these regions, observed in patients concurrently with PCa and RCC, have originated from the PCa rather than the RCC. In this case report, we described a 67-year-old male presented with dysuria for two months and left lower extremity edema for three days. Percutaneous biopsies revealed synchronous primary RCC and PCa. However, the origin of the metastatic tumors, especially those involving the adrenal glands, renal hilum, and retroperitoneal regions, remained undetermined. Subsequent surgical procedures identified that the metastatic lesions originated from the PCa, while the RCC was localized. Ultimately, the patient with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) received combination therapy with rezvilutamide and goserelin, which resulted in a satisfactory treatment response. In patients with concurrent PCa and RCC, metastatic lesions in the adrenal glands, renal hilar, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes may also originate from the PCa. Accurate identification of the primary tumor and proper staging are critical for the appropriate management of patients with multiple primary malignancies with concurrent metastases.

e15591 Background: Prostate and colorectal cancers are among the most common cancers in men. The prevalence of patients (pts) diagnosed with prostate and rectal cancers at the same time (synchronous) is unknown and guidelines for co-management are not well established despite implications on their co-management. This study aggregated data using several methods across New York’s largest healthcare system, studied the prevalence of synchronous diagnoses, and identified a potential need for prostate specific antigen (PSA) assessment in NAPRC guidelines. Methods: We conducted an IRB approved review of pts using 3 different cohorts from 2010-2021: Northwell Health NAPRC tumor boards, the Oncora radiation oncology database, and the Northwell Health clinical informatics tool Population Analyzer to access electronic health records across the entire Northwell Health System. Synchronous diagnosis was defined as prostate cancer diagnosed during the workup of rectal cancer. Results: Ten pts had synchronous prostate and rectal cancers. Workup of prostate cancer was prompted by elevated PSA alone (n = 3), prostate lesion on rectal cancer staging MRI alone (n = 3), or both (n = 4). Two pts declined recommended treatment (tx). Radiation (RT) volume for pts during neoadjuvant RT included the rectum and prostate. Patients received total neoadjuvant therapy (n = 6) or neoadjuvant chemoRT (n = 4) alone. Three pts had surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant tx. Eight patients received androgen deprivation therapy (n = 8); after neoadjuvant tx pts also had prostate-specific RT (n = 6) or prostate brachytherapy (n = 2). Six pts completed neoadjuvant tx; after a median follow up of 25.9 months 4 pts have no evidence of prostate or rectal cancers. One pt has residual disease with plan for surgical resection; one pt developed new metastases. Median overall survival was 114 months with one death. Among 273 newly diagnosed rectal cancer pts presented at NAPRC tumor boards, there were 122 male pts age ≥ 40 years of which 70% (n = 81) did not have PSA screen at rectal cancer diagnosis. Medical oncologists ordered PSA in 72% (n = 13) of pts not evaluated by primary care. Conclusions: We aggregated data via several methods and performed system wide evaluation of electronic health records across New York State’s largest healthcare system. PSA was not evaluated in a majority of eligible pts. These results support PSA testing in NAPRC guidelines for new rectal cancer diagnosis as it is inexpensive, non-invasive, and may prompt prostate cancer workup. Additionally, 3 pts with prostate cancer did not have prostate lesions on rectal MRI imaging, suggesting a potential role for prostate-protocoled imaging during radiological workup of rectal cancer. Future studies are needed to develop best management of synchronous prostate and rectal cancers due to a lack of consensus guidelines.

Objective Adenocarcinoma of the rectum and prostate are common male pelvic cancers. There is limited published data related to synchronous primary rectal and prostate cancer. To present a detailed analysis of patients clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis with synchronous primary rectal and prostate cancer. Methods Clinical data of 4 patients with synchronous primary rectal and prostate cancer who were admitted to the Anorectal Department of the Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo Medical Center from 2013 to 2015 were collected. Patient clinical characteristics and follow-up data were retrieved. We performed radical resection of rectal cancer with prostatectomy for 3 patients including 2 patients by totally laparoscopic procedure, only radical resection of rectal cancer for 1 patients. 3 patients received postoperative chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, 1 patient only received postoperative hormonal therapy. Results The lasting high prostate-specific antigen level was observed in one patient after operation, the others 3 patients had no evidence of tumor recurrence. Conclusions Our experience suggests that the synchronous primary rectal and prostate cancer could had a better survival prognosis than metastasis and recurrence of rectal cancer and prostate cancer. We conclude that efficient, aggressive radical resection of rectal cancer with prostatectomy can be designed for suitable patients with synchronous primary rectal and prostate cancers, and the treatment modality should be carefully made and tailored on the individual patient suffering from this disease. Due to the realistic potential for longterm survival, we recommend aggressive postoperative treatment of these patients, include chemoradiation and hormonal therapy according to guideline. Key words: Rectal neoplasms; Surgical procedures, operative; Synchronous multiple primary cancer; Prostate cancer

Objective: We would like to present a patient with a history of ulcerative colitis suffering from a synchronous rectal and prostate cancer treated with a laparoscopic total proctocolectomy (with TaTME) and Retzius sparing RARP simultaneously.Methods: Retzius sparing RARP with bilateral lymph node harvesting was performed first. Afterwards, TaTME was commenced with the placement of a Lonestar® retractor and GelPort®. Anterior dissection was troubled unexpectedly by outspoken fibrosis. For that reason, it was completed laparoscopically. We then continued with the laparoscopic total proctocolectomy. Last, a transanal circular stapled ileoanal anastomosis was created and a derivating ileostomy was installed.Results: Postoperative proctoscopy showed a patent ileoanal anastomosis. After removal of the Foley catheter on day 21, the patient was immediately continent. Prostate specimen revealed a pT2cN1M0 transmural invasive adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 7 (3 + 4). Pathology analysis of the rectum revealed a stage IIIc transmural invasive moderately differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma (pT3N2bM0) with free margins. He was referred for adjuvant chemotherapy.Conclusions: In this case, the combination of TaTME and Retzius sparing RARP for synchronous rectal and prostate cancer was feasible and safe. We suggest performing the anterior TaTME dissection last, due to disturbing blood flow into the operating field after prostatectomy.

Synchronous prostate cancer (PC) and rectal cancer (RC) is a rare clinical situation. While combining curative-intent management for both cancers can be challenging, available data for guiding the multidisciplinary strategy are lacking. Consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection for a mid-low RC with synchronous PC treated at 9 tertiary-care centers between 2008 and 2018 were included. Management strategy and data on postoperative and long-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, 25 patients underwent curative-intent RC resection combined with PC management. Nine (36%), 10 (40%) and 6 (24%) patients had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PC, respectively. Management mostly consisted of chemoradiotherapy combined in 18 patients (72%) with either TME in 12 patients or pelvic exenteration for resection of both cancers in 6 patients. Most patients underwent RC resection using a laparoscopic approach (n = 16, 64%). Anastomosis was performed in 18 patients (72%) of whom 13 received diverting ileostomy. The complete R0 resection rate was 96% (n = 24). The overall morbidity rate was 64% (n = 16) and 5 patients (20%) experienced severe surgical morbidity of which two died within 90days of surgery after pelvic exenteration. Among patients with anastomosis, 2 patients (11%) experienced anastomotic leak requiring surgical management. After a median follow-up of 31.2months, 3-year OS and RFS were 80.2% (CI 95% 58.8-92.2) and 68.6% (CI 95% 42.3-84.8), respectively. This series is the largest to report that simultaneous curative-intent management of synchronous PC and RC is feasible and safe. Pelvic exenteration might be a better option when RC complete resection seems not achievable through TME.

PurposeAlong with a number of other malignancies, the term “oligometastatic” prostate cancer has recently emerged. It represents an attempt to define a subtype of cancer with a limited metastatic load that might perform more favorably than a distinctly disseminated disease, or even one that may be managed in a potentially curative way. Since there is currently a knowledge gap of what imaging modalities should be utilized to classify patients as having this type of tumor, we aimed to shed light on the role of conventional and marker-based imaging in the setting of synchronous oligometastatic prostate cancer as well as summarize the available evidence for its clinical application.MethodsA literature search on December 15th 2017 was conducted using the Pubmed database.ResultsFunctional imaging techniques like 68Ga PSMA. 68Ga PSMA PET-CT has currently been shown the best detection rates for the assessment of nodal, bone and visceral metastases, especially for smaller lesions at low PSA levels.ConclusionsFunctional imaging helps detect low-burden disease metastatic patients. However, these imaging modalities are not available in every center and thus clinicians may be prone to prescribe systemic treatment rather than referring patients for cytoreductive treatments. We hope that the ongoing prospective trials will help guide clinicians in making a more personalized management of synchronous metastatic patients.

The management of synchronous prostate and rectal cancer is a challeging task for the general surgeons and urologists, due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis and the sequential significant effects on the patient’s functional independency and quality of life. As both rectal and prostate cancers still remain leading causes of death in the male population, along with the increase of the average life expectancy, it is certain that synchronous prostate and rectal cancer will be a clinical scenario that the clinicians of the future will encounter more frequently. Our aim is to perform a comprehensive review on the management of this oncological entity, focusing on the significance of multidisciplinary approach which will enable the formation of an accurate strategy plan, having at all times the patient in the center of desicion-making.

Zinner’s syndrome is a rare congenital disorder presenting with unilateral renal agenesis or dysgenesis, ipsilateral seminal vesicle cysts, and ejaculatory duct obstruction. Treatment of this syndrome can be conservative or surgical. In this case report, we describe the case of a 72-year-old patient who was diagnosed with Zinner’s syndrome and underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment. The peculiarity of our case was that the patient’s ureter emptied ectopically into the left seminal vesicle, which was notably enlarged and multicystic in appearance. Although many minimally invasive procedures have been reported for treating symptomatic Zinner’s syndrome, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of prostate cancer in a patient with Zinner’s syndrome who was treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can be safely and efficiently performed in patients with Zinner’s syndrome and synchronous prostate cancer by urological surgeons with extensive experience in laparoscopy in high-volume centers.

The Prevalence and Management of Synchronous Prostate and Rectal Cancer

Purpose: To perform a multi-institutional analysis of patients with synchronous prostate and rectosigmoid cancers.Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center records was performed for men with both prostate and rectosigmoid adenocarcinomas from 1988 to 2017. Synchronous presentation was defined as symptoms, diagnosis, or treatment of both cancers within 12 months of each other. The primary study endpoint was overall survival. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression was performed.Results: Among 31,883 men with prostate cancer, 330 (1%) also had rectosigmoid cancer and 54 (16%) of these were synchronous. Prostate cancer was more commonly the initial diagnosis (59%). Fifteen (28%) underwent prostatectomy or radiotherapy before an established diagnosis of rectosigmoid cancer. Stage I, II–III, or IV rectosigmoid cancer was present in 26, 57, and 17% of men, respectively. At a median follow-up of 43 months, there were 18 deaths due rectosigmoid cancer and two deaths due to prostate cancer. Crude late grade ≥3 toxicities include nine (17%) gastrointestinal and six (11%) genitourinary. Two anastomotic leaks following low anterior resection occurred in men who received a neoadjuvant radiotherapy prostate dose of 70.6–76.4 Gy. Rectosigmoid cancer stages II–III (HR 4.3, p = 0.02) and IV (HR 16, p < 0.01) as well as stage IV prostate cancer (HR 31, p < 0.01) were associated with overall survival on multivariable analysis.Conclusions: Synchronous rectosigmoid cancer is a greater contributor to mortality than prostate cancer. Men aged ≥45 with localized prostate cancer should undergo colorectal cancer screening prior to treatment to evaluate for synchronous rectosigmoid cancer.

Cases of synchronous prostate and colorectal adenocarcinomas have been sporadically reported. There are case reports on patients with synchronous prostate and rectal cancers treated with external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with high‐dose rate brachytherapy boost to the prostate. Here, we illustrate a patient with synchronous prostate and rectal cancers treated using the volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique. The patient was treated with radical radiotherapy to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the pelvis, incorporating the involved internal iliac node and the prostate. A boost of 24 Gy in 12 fractions was delivered to the prostate only, using VMAT. Treatment‐related toxicities and follow‐up prostate‐specific antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen were collected for data analysis. At 12 months, the patient achieved complete response for both rectal and prostate cancers without significant treatment‐related toxicities.