Abstract

In the scenario of growing polarization of promises and dangers that surround artificial intelligence (AI), how to introduce responsible AI and robotics in healthcare? In this paper, we develop an ethical–political approach to introduce democratic mechanisms to technological development, what we call “Caring in the In-Between”. Focusing on the multiple possibilities for action that emerge in the realm of uncertainty, we propose an ethical and responsible framework focused on care actions in between fears and hopes. Using the theoretical perspective of Science and Technology Studies and empirical research, “Caring in the In-Between” is based on three movements: the first is a change of focus from the world of promises and dangers to the world of uncertainties; the second is a conceptual shift from assuming a relationship with robotics based on a Human–Robot Interaction to another focused on the network in which the robot is embedded (the “Robot Embedded in a Network”); and the last is an ethical shift from a general normative framework to a discussion on the context of use. Based on these suggestions, “Caring in the In-Between” implies institutional challenges, as well as new practices in healthcare systems. It is articulated around three simultaneous processes, each of them related to practical actions in the “in-between” dimensions considered: monitoring relations and caring processes, through public engagement and institutional changes; including concerns and priorities of stakeholders, with the organization of participatory processes and alternative forms of representation; and making fears and hopes commensurable, through the choice of progressive and reversible actions.

Highlights

  • In the landscape of imaginaries that surround artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in healthcare, there is a prominent debate regarding utopian and dystopian scenarios, whereby social and ethical discussions are polarized between the promises and the dangers of AI

  • As a proposal to go beyond this scenario of promises/ dangers, we develop an approach to introduce responsible AI and robotics to healthcare based on three movements: (a) the first is a change of focus from the world of promises and dangers to the world of uncertainties; (b) the second is a conceptual shift from assuming a relationship with robotics based on a Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) to another focused on the network in which the robot is embedded; and the last is (c) an ethical shift from a general normative framework to a discussion on the context of use, from the logic of the ethics of care

  • The one that follows contextualizes our research on care robots; we develop the three movements on which we base our proposal: in Sect. 3 we focus on the movement from the world of promises and dangers to the world of uncertainties, in Sect. 4 we explore the movement from HRI to a Robot embedded in a network (REN) relation and, in Sect. 5 we explain the movement from an general ethical framework to the context of use, from the ethics of care; in Sect. 6 we outline our ethical–political proposal to introduce responsible robotics and AI to healthcare and; we summarize the main conclusions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the landscape of imaginaries that surround artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in healthcare, there is a prominent debate regarding utopian and dystopian scenarios, whereby social and ethical discussions are polarized between the promises and the dangers of AI.

The narrative of promises and dangers in AI
Empirical research on care robots in a children’s hospital
From the world of promises and dangers to the world of uncertainties
Caring in the in‐between
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.