Abstract

BackgroundA population-based programme of health checks has been established in England. Participants receive postal invitations through a population-based call–recall system but health check providers may also offer health checks opportunistically. We compared cardiovascular risk scores for ‘invited’ and ‘opportunistic’ health checks.MethodsCohort study of all health checks completed at 18 general practices from July 2013 to June 2015. For each general practice, cardiovascular (CVD) risk scores were compared by source of check and pooled using meta-analysis. Effect estimates were compared by gender, age-group, ethnicity and fifths of deprivation.ResultsThere were 6184 health checks recorded (2280 invited and 3904 opportunistic) with CVD risk scores recorded for 5359 (87%) participants. There were 17.0% of invited checks and 22.2% of opportunistic health checks with CVD risk score ≥10%; a relative increment of 28% (95% confidence interval: 14–44%, P < 0.001). In the most deprived quintile, 15.3% of invited checks and 22.4% of opportunistic checks were associated with elevated CVD risk (adjusted odds ratio: 1.94, 1.37–2.74, P < 0.001).ConclusionsRespondents at health checks performed opportunistically are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than those participating in response to a standard invitation letter, potentially reducing the effect of uptake inequalities.

Highlights

  • A programme of health checks for cardiovascular risk assessment has been established in England since 2011.1 The programme has proved controversial because of the limited evidence for the potential effectiveness of health checks2,3 and the arguably low cost-effectiveness when compared with population-wide intervention strategies.4 A programme of health checks might exacerbate inequalities in cardiovascular disease if uptake of health checks is lower in groups at greater risk of cardiovascular disease.5Implementation of the national health check programme is tailored flexibly in local areas

  • Respondents at health checks performed opportunistically are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than those participating in response to a standard invitation letter, potentially reducing the effect of uptake inequalities

  • 12 643 participants were invited through the population-based call–recall system, 2280 of these participants had health checks recorded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A programme of health checks for cardiovascular risk assessment has been established in England since 2011.1 The programme has proved controversial because of the limited evidence for the potential effectiveness of health checks and the arguably low cost-effectiveness when compared with population-wide intervention strategies. A programme of health checks might exacerbate inequalities in cardiovascular disease if uptake of health checks is lower in groups at greater risk of cardiovascular disease.5Implementation of the national health check programme is tailored flexibly in local areas. A programme of health checks for cardiovascular risk assessment has been established in England since 2011.1 The programme has proved controversial because of the limited evidence for the potential effectiveness of health checks and the arguably low cost-effectiveness when compared with population-wide intervention strategies.. A programme of health checks might exacerbate inequalities in cardiovascular disease if uptake of health checks is lower in groups at greater risk of cardiovascular disease.. The health check programme in South London employs a population-based call–recall system, based on general practice population. A population-based programme of health checks has been established in England. Participants receive postal invitations through a population-based call–recall system but health check providers may offer health checks opportunistically. We compared cardiovascular risk scores for ‘invited’ and ‘opportunistic’ health checks

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.