Cardiac motion in patients with ventricular tachycardia: potential implications for the treatment of patients candidates to stereotactic arrhythmia radio-ablation (STAR)

Abstract

Abstract Background Stereotactic arrhythmia radio-ablation (STAR) has proven to be a valid alternative treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients who are unsuitable to undergo standard catheter ablation (CA). It consists in the application of external beam radiotherapy in a single dose of 25 Gy to the target areas. There is increased research activity on better understanding the complex and fast motion of the heart and on reducing radiation toxicity. Purpose In the context of an in silico study to evaluate the feasibility of STAR with protons in patients with VT, the initial findings related to cardiac motion on the first 10 patients are here presented. Methods Prior to CA, each patient underwent ECG gated CT scans in expiratory breath-hold, with and without contrast and reconstructed at 30% (systole) and 80% (diastole) of the cardiac R-R cycle. Contouring of the ablation target as a clinical target volume (CTV) for proton treatment planning was performed based on a standard electrophysiological study with 3D eletroanatomical mapping. Two different treatment plans were created: the first with only the diastolic CTV as target (gated treatment), the second including both diastolic and systolic CTVs to create an Internal Target Volume (ITV) in the hypothesis of non-gated treatment. Robust optimization was used to create the Planning Target Volume (PTV). Results The target volumes used for treatment planning are given in Table 1. The median CTV was 10.90 (2.93-36.94) cm3 for diastole and 14.26 (1.73-36.31) cm3 for systole. These volumes are somewhat smaller than those reported in patients treated previously with STAR: this difference may be due to the fact that no respiratory motion was included in the target contour and that the study population includes many patients referred for ventricular ectopic beats without structural heart disease, where the ablation target is expected to be smaller as compared to patients with VT in structural heart disease. Despite a small median difference between the diastolic and systolic CTV of 0.53 (0.03-9.61) cm3, the ITV approach resulted in a median increase in volume compared to the largest of the two CTVs of 29 % (1%-44%). When considering the proton range uncertainty and potential errors in patient positioning (PTV), the target is this time enlarged by a factor 2.9 (1.9-3.9). This data indicates that both cardiac motion and uncertainties in patient positioning before treatment will have a large impact on the treatment volume thus affecting the amount of surrounding tissue exposed to radiation. Conclusion The ablation target contour at systole and diastole are of similar magnitude but their non-overlap results in a large increase in treated volume when radiation delivery is not gated for cardiac motion. Further analysis shall investigate on a case-by-case basis the potential reduction in risk of healthy tissue toxicity with cardiac-gated proton delivery.Table 1