Abstract

Abstract The main advantage of CO 2 is that at most reservoir conditions it is a supercritical fluid which is likely to develop miscibility with the oil. In reservoirs that miscibility cannot be achieved, CO 2 injection can lead to additional oil recovery by mixing with the oil and favourably modifying the flow properties of the oil. Displacement and recovery of oil by CO 2 injection has been studied and applied in the field extensively in the past three decades. Concerns over the environmental impact of CO 2 have led to a resurgence of interest in CO 2 injection in oil reservoirs. The injection of CO 2 can enhance oil recovery from these reservoirs and at the same time help mitigating the problem of increased CO 2 concentrations in the atmosphere by storing large quantities of CO 2 for a long period of time. CO 2 injection projects so far have been mainly limited geographically to oil fields located in areas where large quantities of CO 2 have been available mainly from natural resources. Various CO 2 injection strategies e.g. cyclic injection, continuous CO 2 flood, alternating (WAG) or simultaneous injection of CO 2 and water have been applied in these fields. With the new global interest in CO 2 injection, many other reservoir settings and scenarios are being considered for CO 2 injection in oil reservoirs. This may require injection strategies other than those conventionally used for CO 2 injection especially for offshore reservoirs or in cases where the supply of CO 2 can be variable or limited. An alternative CO 2 injection strategy is carbonated (CO 2 -enriched) water injection. In carbonated water, CO 2 exists as a dissolved phase as opposed to a free phase eliminating the problems of gravity segregation and poor sweep efficiency, which are characteristics of a typical CO 2 injection project. In fact, both viscosity and density of water increase as a result of the dissolution of CO 2 in water. In terms of CO 2 storage, through carbonated water injection, large volumes of CO 2 can be injected into the reservoir without the risk of leakage of CO 2 through caprock. Using the results of a series of high-pressure flow visualisation experiments, we reveal the underlying physical processes taking place during CWI. The results show that CWI, compared to conventional water injection, improves oil recovery in both secondary (pre-waterflood) and tertiary (post-waterflood) injection modes. Several key mechanisms taking place at the pore level during CWI leading to additional recovery are presented and discussed. Both conventional (light) oil and viscous oil was used in the experiments.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.