Carbon Dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas‐Fir: Influence of Water and Nutrient Availability

Abstract

Changes in biomass distribution, canopy dynamics, and above— and belowground net primary production were examined in a Rocky Mountain Douglas—fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca forest in New Mexico. Nutrient and water availability were experimentally altered by: fertilization (F), irrigation (I), carbon in the form of wood chips (WC), carbon + irrigation (WC/I), and control (C). Prior to treatment, aboveground tree biomass ranged from 238 to 369 000 kg/ha, projected leaf area index (LAI) ranged from 5.4 to 8.7 m2/m2 and aboveground net primary production (ANPP) ranged from 9200 to 11 900 kg · ha—1 · yr—1. Aboveground NPP was correlated positively (R2 = 0.85) with LAI before the treatments. Canopy dynamics were strongly influenced by water and nutrient availability. For trees of similar diameter, irrigated and fertilized trees supported a significantly greater biomass of new twig and new foliage than control trees. During the 2—yr study leaf area index (LAI) increased by 5, 12, 18, and 24% in the C, I, WC/I, and F plots, respectively, and decreased by 3% in the WC plots. Stand level biomass distribution and production patterns were also affected by the availability of nutrients and water. Two years after the treatments were initiated, new foliage masses were 2400 (F), 2300 (WC/I), 2000 (I), 1900 (C), and 1800 (WC) kg/ha. In 1986, aboveground NPP was 33% greater in the F than WC treatment. Irrigation also increased ANPP. Fine root net primary production ranged from 1540 to 4200 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 and was significantly greater (P < .1) in the control than in the four treatments. BNPP comprised 46 (C), 32 (WC), 31 (I), 23 (WC/I), and 23 (F) % of total NPP. Total NPP was correlated positively with LAI (R2 = 0.66) and ranged from 15 360 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 in the WC treatment to 21 140 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 in the F treatment. Many of the physiological relations between water or nutrient availability and production and carbon allocation reported in this study are consistent with results from studies on lowland Douglas—fir and other conifer forests in the Pacific Northwest. Collectively, these studies provide a mechanistic understanding of how water and nutrient availability govern production and carbon allocation of conifer forests in the western United States.