Abstract

The capital and income breeding concept links energy resources used during reproduction to the timing of their acquisition. During reproduction, capital breeders rely on resources gained previously and accumulated for reproductive investment. By contrast, income breeders use mainly resources collected during the period of reproductive activity. Most commonly, this concept is applied to females; relatively few studies have considered males. Moreover, there has been little attention to the link between the capital-income divide and other aspects of mating strategy. We studied adult males of three wild ungulates with different levels of polygyny. A large dataset (4,264 red deer, 53,619 roe deer, and 13,537 Alpine chamois, respectively) was obtained during 2007–2017 in the whole territory of Slovenia and in the Trento province, Italy. During the rut, body mass loss of males in highly polygynous species was more than twice that of weakly polygynous species: on average, red deer stags lost 19.5%; chamois bucks 16.0%; and roe deer bucks 7.5% of their body mass. This indicates potential for a hitherto unrecognised link between the degree of intrasexual competition and the degree of capital mating. The variability in body mass at the end of the rut was clearly reduced in both highly polygynous species (from 15.1 to 9.4% in red deer, and from 12.5 to 10.5% in chamois), but did not change in roe deer. Finally, roe deer bucks had recovered body mass to that of the pre-rut period by just 2 months after the rut, while red deer stags did not manage to compensate the loss of weight until the end of the year. We suggest that, at least in ungulates, there is a link between the degree of polygyny and that of capital breeding. Males of capital and income breeders underwent body mass changes resulting from different reproductive investment during the rut. Capital breeders lost considerably more weight, and invested a variable amount of energy among individuals or among years, possibly to cope with different environmental or body conditions. In so doing, they ended the rut with poorer but more even condition among individuals.

Highlights

  • Capital and income breeding concepts were developed to help differentiate broad strategies for “financing” the costs of reproduction in animal species: “capital breeding” describes the situation in which reproduction is financed using stored capital; by contrast, “income breeding” refers to the use of concurrent intake to pay for a reproductive attempt (Drent and Daan, 1980; Jönsson, 1997)

  • In the best time series model determined by intervention analysis, the trend in roe deer standardized body mass exhibited three break points (Figure 1)

  • A model with two break points provided the best explanation for the body mass time series of red deer (Figure 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Capital and income breeding concepts were developed to help differentiate broad strategies for “financing” the costs of reproduction in animal species: “capital breeding” describes the situation in which reproduction is financed using stored capital; by contrast, “income breeding” refers to the use of concurrent intake to pay for a reproductive attempt (Drent and Daan, 1980; Jönsson, 1997). These strategies have been recognized to lie toward either end of a continuum of capital-to-income approaches to reproduction, and that placement along that continuum can vary among age classes of the same sex (Houston et al, 2007; Jaatinen et al, 2016; Williams et al, 2017). The obvious metric to estimate the investment of rutting males is their loss of weight during the rut (Mysterud et al, 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.