Abstract
This paper argues for an open, reflexive, iterative process of risk assessment, prioritization, and management. It maintains that, while quantitative risk assessments are helpful starting points, the risks of many situations cannot be understood without taking into account uncertainties in alternative risk management approaches. It also maintains that decisions on risk prioritization and management should take into account how risks will be distributed. If either uncertainty or inequity is ignored, intractable conflicts may arise which can derail the necessarily political process of assessing, prioritizing, and managing risk.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
