Abstract
This paper presents an ensemble of parallel artificial neural networks (ANN) that were successfully able to diagnose the condition of bushings using California State and IEEE C57.104 criteria taking fourteen variables of dissolved gas analysis (DGA) data for each oil impregnated paper bushing. The work compares the speed, stability and accuracy of collective parallel networks to that of individual artificial neural networks (ANN) of radial basis function (RBF), support vector machines (SVM), multiple layer perceptron (MLP) and Bayesian (BNN) networks. The analysis on 1255 bushings concludes that collective network has a better solution than the neural networks individually. In deciding whether to remove or leave a bushing in service, the accuracy of the individual networks was 60% for RBF, 88% for SVM, and 99% for MLP and 94% for BNN. The committee of ANN produced an accuracy of 99%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.