Abstract

BackgroundResearchers in biomedical informatics use ontologies and terminologies to annotate their data in order to facilitate data integration and translational discoveries. As the use of ontologies for annotation of biomedical datasets has risen, a common challenge is to identify ontologies that are best suited to annotating specific datasets. The number and variety of biomedical ontologies is large, and it is cumbersome for a researcher to figure out which ontology to use.MethodsWe present the Biomedical Ontology Recommender web service. The system uses textual metadata or a set of keywords describing a domain of interest and suggests appropriate ontologies for annotating or representing the data. The service makes a decision based on three criteria. The first one is coverage, or the ontologies that provide most terms covering the input text. The second is connectivity, or the ontologies that are most often mapped to by other ontologies. The final criterion is size, or the number of concepts in the ontologies. The service scores the ontologies as a function of scores of the annotations created using the National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) Annotator web service. We used all the ontologies from the UMLS Metathesaurus and the NCBO BioPortal.ResultsWe compare and contrast our Recommender by an exhaustive functional comparison to previously published efforts. We evaluate and discuss the results of several recommendation heuristics in the context of three real world use cases. The best recommendations heuristics, rated ‘very relevant’ by expert evaluators, are the ones based on coverage and connectivity criteria. The Recommender service (alpha version) is available to the community and is embedded into BioPortal.

Highlights

  • Biomedical ontologies are widely used to design information retrieval systems, to facilitate interoperability between data repositories, and to develop systems that parse, annotate or index biomedical data resources

  • Biomedical ontologies have been identified as a crucial means for representing knowledge and annotate biomedical data in order to create a biomedical semantic web

  • We have discussed the need of ontology recommendation in order to design new ontologies and annotate data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background Biomedical ontologies are widely used to design information retrieval systems, to facilitate interoperability between data repositories, and to develop systems that parse, annotate or index biomedical data resources. Biomedical researchers use ontologies and terminologies to annotate (or tag) their data with ontology terms for better data integration and translational discoveries [1,2]. The number and variety (formats, locations) of biomedical ontologies is so large that choosing one for an annotation task or for designing a specific application is a difficult challenge. The process to choose a set of ontologies to use is oftentimes a hard, manual and time consuming task for researchers. Researchers in biomedical informatics use ontologies and terminologies to annotate their data in order to facilitate data integration and translational discoveries. The number and variety of biomedical ontologies is large, and it is cumbersome for a researcher to figure out which ontology to use

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.