Abstract
The effects, under the present system of automobile insurance, of three-party coverage of income loss and two party coverage of automobile damage are explored in this study. A large sample survey has been conducted and the distribution of compensation is found to be biased against the serious injury and fatality cases. These are the large-loss cases which are forced by the present system to rely on three-party insurance for compensation. This discrimination is shown to affect public opinion of the insurance industry adversely and very significantly. The advantages of extending no fault insurance to include income loss are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
