Abstract
Our proposal is to present a Blind and Referenced Image Quality Assessment or BRIQA. Thus, the main proposal of this paper is to propose an Interface, which contains not only a Full-Referenced Image Quality Assessment (IQA) but also a No- Referenced or Blind IQA applying perceptual concepts by means of Contrast Band-Pass Filtering (CBPF). Then, this proposal consists in contrast a degraded input image with the filtered versions of several distances by a CBPF, which computes some of the Human Visual System (HVS) variables. If BRIQA detects only one input, it performs a Blind Image Quality Assessment, on the contrary if BRIQA detects two inputs, it considers that a Referenced Image Quality Assessment will be computed. Thus, we first define a Full-Reference IQA and then a No-Reference IQA, which correlation is important when is contrasted with the psychophysical results performed by several observers. BRIQA weights the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio by using an algorithm that estimates some properties of the Human Visual System. Then, we compare BRIQA algorithm not only with the mainstream estimator in IQA, PSNR, but also state-of-the-art IQA algorithms, such as Structural SIMilarity (SSIM), Mean Structural SIMilarity (MSSIM), Visual Information Fidelity (VIF), etc. Our experiments show that the correlation of BRIQA correlated with PSNR is important, but this proposal does not need imperatively the reference image in order to estimate the quality of the recovered image.
Highlights
The evolution of sophisticated Models and applications of Processing of Digital Images gives as a result of extensive literature describing these models
BRIQA is a metric divided in two algorithms full-reference (RIQA) and non-reference (BIQA) image quality assessments based on filtered weighting of Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) by using a model that tries to simulate some features of the Human Visual System (CBPF model)
Both proposed metrics in BRIQA are based on five steps
Summary
The evolution of sophisticated Models and applications of Processing of Digital Images gives as a result of extensive literature describing these models. Images are presumably distorted during the whole process of compression or representation. It is important in the coding process of any image to improve image quality in order to identify and quantify the degree of degradation of a digital image. MSE or Mean Square Error is yet the most used quantitative metrics, since many other algorithms which evaluate image quality are based on it, Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), for instance. Both MSE and PSNR are widely used in the field of image processing, as these algorithms have favorable features: 1) Convenient for the purpose of optimizing a certain algorithm that needs to improve quality. Either MSE or PSNR do not correlates with Human Visual System (HVS)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.