Brinley plots, explained variance, and the analysis of age differences in response latencies.

Abstract

Critics of Brinley plot analyses (e.g., Fisk, Fisher, & Rogers, 1992; Perfect, 1994) claim: (a) that lack of overlap between latencies on different tasks inflates r2 values; (b) that Brinley plots mask task-specific age differences; and (c) that measurement error in young adults' latencies precludes the use of regression techniques with Brinley plot data. We dispute these claims. We show that lack of overlap does not inflate r2 and that the possible presence of task-specific effects in Brinley plot data may be evaluated using standard regression techniques. These techniques are illustrated using data from the Fisk and Rogers (1991) study of visual and memory search. Analysis of their data reveals significant differences between the lexical and nonlexical domains, but not between types of search. Finally, the effect of measurement error on Brinley plot analyses is shown to be small and, if taken into account, leads to increased support for general cognitive slowing.