Abstract

Over the past decade, the Supreme Court has frequently reversed the Federal Circuit for adopting procedural rules for patent cases that differed from those that apply in other federal cases. TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods likewise concerns the Federal Circuit’s approach to a procedural issue in patent cases, namely, venue. However, unlike in the prior cases before the Court, the Federal Circuit is not an outlier on this issue. Rather, the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of the venue statute is consistent with the statute’s plain language and with broader historical trends in venue law. While the petitioner and amici in support of petitioner raise important policy questions about forum choice in patent cases, Congressional legislation or alterations to personal jurisdiction doctrine by this Court are more appropriate avenues of reform.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.