Abstract

We analyze the competitive effects of resale price maintenance (RPM) in circumstances in which multiple manufacturers use RPM and distributors have incentives to free-ride on other distributors’ pre-sale services, which can be specific to a manufacturer's brand to some extent. In the antitrust literature and practices, RPM solving the free-rider problem is perceived mostly as pro-competitive, while multiple manufacturers’ RPM is perceived as anti-competitive based on their collusive incentives. In our circumstances, distributors’ services may differentiate manufacturers’ brands ex post, as is desired by manufacturers. Thus, despite solving the free-rider problem, multiple manufacturers’ RPM may harm consumers by softening inter-brand price competition.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.