Abstract
Boundary element methods (BEM) have been used for propeller hydrodynamic calculations since the 1990s. More recently, these methods are being used in combination with finite element methods (FEM) in order to calculate flexible propeller fluid–structure interaction (FSI) response. The main advantage of using BEM for flexible propeller FSI calculations is the relatively low computational demand in comparison with higher fidelity methods. However, the BEM modelling of flexible propellers is not straightforward and requires several important modelling decisions. The consequences of such modelling choices depend significantly on propeller structural behaviour and flow condition. The two dimensionless quantities that characterise structural behaviour and flow condition are the structural frequency ratio (the ratio between the lowest excitation frequency and the fundamental wet blade natural frequency) and the reduced frequency. For both, general expressions have been derived for (flexible) marine propellers. This work shows that these expressions can be effectively used to estimate the dry and wet fundamental blade frequencies and the structural frequency ratio. This last parameter and the reduced frequency of vibrating blade flows is independent of the geometrical blade scale as shown in this work. Regarding the BEM-FEM coupled analyses, it is shown that a quasi-static FEM modelling does not suffice, particularly due to the fluid-added mass and hydrodynamic damping contributions that are not negligible. It is demonstrated that approximating the hydro-elastic blade response by using closed form expressions for the fluid added mass and hydrodynamic damping terms provides reasonable results, since the structural response of flexible propellers is stiffness dominated, meaning that the importance of modelling errors in fluid added mass and hydrodynamic damping is small. Finally, it is shown that the significance of recalculating the hydrodynamic influence coefficients is relatively small. This fact might be utilized, possibly in combination with the use of the closed form expressions for fluid added mass and hydrodynamic damping contributions, to significantly reduce the computation time of flexible propeller FSI calculations.
Highlights
Over the last two decades, an increased interest in flexible propellers can be noticed given the growing list of publications on the hydro-elastic analysis of flexible marine propellers
Despite the limitations of a boundary element methods (BEM) and the complicated flow characteristics considered in that work, a fairly good estimate of the propeller hydro-elastic response was obtained with the BEM-finite element methods (FEM) approach
This work presents expressions to characterize the flow and structural response of flexible marine propellers. From these formulas, the conclusion can be drawn that the structural frequency ratio of flexible blades and the reduced frequency of vibrating blade flows is independent of the geometrical propeller scale
Summary
Over the last two decades, an increased interest in flexible propellers can be noticed given the growing list of publications on the hydro-elastic analysis of flexible marine propellers. Several publications present a methodology for the numerical analysis of these types of propellers in steady and unsteady inflow conditions. These methods typically involve partitioned fluid–structure interaction (FSI) computations, meaning that the fluid and structural problem are separately solved and coupling iterations are required to converge to the fully coupled solution. For steady propeller FSI computations mainly Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) methods [1,2,3,4] and boundary element methods (BEM) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] have been used for solving the fluid part of the coupled problem. Given the relatively low computational demand of BEM in comparison to a RANS method, BEM is an attractive method for the FSI analysis of flexible propellers
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
