Abstract
We exploit a quasi-natural experiment in the peer-to-peer lending market to show that the mechanism determining interest rates, irrespective of their levels, influences households' decisions to participate in credit markets. A large online platform unexpectedly switched from auction pricing of loans to centralized price assignment by credit grade. After the change all borrowers in a given credit grade were assigned the same interest rate, potentially exacerbating asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. Surprisingly, we find that the creditworthiness of borrowers listing on the platform improves. This effect is mainly driven by lower quality borrowers leaving the platform, and is most pronounced for households looking to consolidate existing debt. As a result, less credit is allocated to lower credit quality borrowers. Our findings suggest that the manner in which interest rates are set is an important determinant of households' financing decisions and of selection into credit markets.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
