Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between board characteristics and external audit fees for Fortune 1000 companies. Competing arguments exist regarding the possible relationship between board characteristics and fees. One view is that a more independent, diligent, and expert board would be more concerned with effectively discharging its monitoring role and would be more supportive of the external audit function. Such a board would be likely to insist on enhanced audit scope, thus increasing the audit fee. An alternative view is that a more independent, diligent, and expert board would reduce the auditor's assessment of control risk and would substitute some of its own monitoring for the monitoring of the auditor. This would reduce audit effort, thus decreasing the audit fee. Consistent with the first view, we find significant positive relationships between board independence, diligence, and expertise and audit fees. A more independent, diligent, and expert board does not appear to substitute for audit effort; rather, such a board may complement auditor oversight. These results add to the growing body of literature documenting a relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and various facets of the financial reporting and audit processes. In addition, the results add to our understanding of the determinants of audit fees.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
