Abstract

A controversial management plan designed to reduce the risk of domestic cattle contracting the disease brucellosis calls for government officials to haze, capture, and kill wild bison that cross Yellowstone National Park's boundary with Montana. Perceptions of the brucellosis risk have been amplified by the actions of state and federal governmental institutions. These actions are shaped by the economic and political contexts in which these institutions operate. In the mid-1990s, when the conflict over bison management escalated, negotiations of agreements for the free trade of cattle placed substantial pressure on the state to maintain a federal designation of “brucellosis-free.” An analytic-deliberative approach to risk assessment might benefit bison management at Yellowstone. Because contemporary environmental issues frequently revolve around the management of risk, risk perception literature should be added to the “eclectic equipment” that comprises political ecology.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.