Biophysical impact of custom shield materials and apertures on electron beam dosimetry: a Monte Carlo study for clinical applications

Uncertainties in dosimetric data and beam calibration

Uncertainties in Dosimetric Data and Beam Calibration: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, November 1990, Vol. 19, pp. 1233–1247

The Racetrack Microtron MM50 capable of taking out x-rays and electron beams having a high energy of up to 50 MeV was evaluated by a dosimetry of electron beams in comparison with Microtron MM22. The MM50 flattens the intensity of electron beams by using the beam scanning method while the MM22 utilizes the flattening-filter method. A percentage depth dose (PDD) curve was obtained through the dosimetry of electron beams using a water phantom. As compared with the MM22, the MM50 emits an electron beam that has an energy much closer to the nominal one, that is less contaminated by x-rays, and whose intensity decreases steeply down to near zero on the PDD curve. The MM50 has an electron beam dose distribution that is practically useful since the dose tends to be concentrated on the target volume.

For megavoltage photon radiation, the fundamental dosimetry characteristics of Gafchromic EBT3 film were determined in 60Co gamma ray beam with addition of experimental and Monte Carlo (MC)‐simulated energy dependence of the film for 6 MV photon beam and 6 MeV, 9 MeV, 12 MeV, and 16 MeV electron beams in water phantom. For the film read‐out, two phase correction of scanner sensitivity was applied: a matrix correction for scanning area and dose‐dependent correction by iterative procedure. With these corrections, the uniformity of response can be improved to be within ±50 pixel values (PVs). To improve the read‐out accuracy, a procedure with flipped film orientations was established. With the method, scanner uniformity can be improved further and dust particles, scratches and/or dirt on scanner glass can be detected and eliminated. Responses from red and green channels were averaged for read‐out, which decreased the effect of noise present in values from separate channels. Since the signal level with the blue channel is considerably lower than with other channels, the signal variation due to different perturbation effects increases the noise level so that the blue channel is not recommended to be used for dose determination. However, the blue channel can be used for the detection of emulsion thickness variations for film quality evaluations with unexposed films. With electron beams ranging from 6 MeV to 16 MeV and at reference measurement conditions in water, the energy dependence of the EBT3 film is uniform within 0.5%, with uncertainties close to 1.6% (k=2). Including 6 MV photon beam and the electron beams mentioned, the energy dependence is within 1.1%. No notable differences were found between the experimental and MC‐simulated responses, indicating negligible change in intrinsic energy dependence of the EBT3 film for 6 MV photon beam and 6 MeV–16 MeV electron beams. Based on the dosimetric characteristics of the EBT3 film, the read‐out procedure established, the nearly uniform energy dependence found and the estimated uncertainties, the EBT3 film was concluded to be a suitable 2D dosimeter for measuring electron or mixed photon/electron dose distributions in water phantom. Uncertainties of 3.7% (k=2) for absolute and 2.3% (k=2) for relative dose were estimated.PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K‐, 87.55.Qr

The status of the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams is analysed, taking into account the main developments in the field since the implementation of the IAEA Code of Practice in the Nordic countries. In electron beam dosimetry, energy-range relationships are discussed; Monte-Carlo results with different codes are compared with the experimentally derived empirical expression used in most protocols. Updated calculations of water-to-air stopping-power ratios following the changes in the Monte-Carlo code used to compute actual Sw,air values are compared with the data included in most dosimetry protocols. The validity of the commonly used procedure to select stopping-power ratios for a clinical beam from the mean energy at the phantom surface and the depth of measurement, is analysed for 'realistic' electron beams. In photon beam dosimetry, calculated correction factors including the effect of the wall plus waterproofing sleeve and existing data on the shift of the effective point of measurement of an ionization chamber, are discussed. New calculations of medium-to-air stopping-power ratios and their correlation with the quality of the beam obtained from the convolution of Monte-Carlo kernels are presented together with their possible practical implications in dosimetry. Trends in Primary Standard Dosimetry Laboratories towards implementing calibrations in terms of absorbed dose to water are presented, emphasizing controversial proposals for the specification of photon beam qualities. Plane-parallel ionization chambers are discussed regarding aspects that affect determinations of absorbed dose, either through the different methods used for the calibration of these chambers or by means of correction factors. Recent studies on the effect of the central electrode in Farmer-type cylindrical chambers are described.

Objective. This work aims at investigating the response of various thermally stimulated luminescence detectors (TLDs) and optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) for dosimetry of ultra-high dose rate electron beams. The study was driven by the challenges of dosimetry at ultra-high dose rates and the importance of dosimetry for FLASH radiotherapy and radiobiology experiments. Approach. Three types of TLDs (LiF:Mg,Ti; LiF:Mg,Cu,P; CaF2:Tm) and one type of OSLD (Al2O3:C) were irradiated in a 15 MeV electron beam with instantaneous dose rates in the (1–324) kGy s−1 range. Reference dosimetry was carried out with an integrating current transformer, which was calibrated in absorbed dose to water against a reference ionization chamber. Additionally, dose rate independent BeO OSLDs were employed as a reference. Beam non-uniformity was addressed using a matrix of TLDs/OSLDs. Main results. The investigated TLDs were shown to be dose rate independent within the experimental uncertainties, which take into account the uncertainty of the dosimetry protocol and the irradiation uncertainty. The relative deviation between the TLDs and the reference dose was lower than 4 % for all dose rates. A decreasing response with the dose rate was observed for Al2O3:C OSLDs, but still within 10 % from the reference dose. Significance. The precision of the investigated luminescence detectors make them suitable for dosimetry of ultra-high dose rate electron beams. Specifically, the dose rate independence of the TLDs can support the investigation of the beam uniformity as a function of the dose rate, which is one of the challenges of the employed beam. Al2O3:C OSLDs provided high precision measurements, but the decreasing response with the dose rate needs to be confirmed by additional experiments.

A sensitometric study of Kodak XV and EDR-2 radiographic films (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY) was performed using photons ranging from 75 kV to 18 MV and electrons ranging from 6 to 20 MeV. To investigate the applicability of the EDR-2 film for clinical radiation dosimetry, percentage depth-doses, profiles and distributions in open and dynamically wedged fields were measured using film and compared with data from a linear diode. Moreover, conventional quality assurance dose parameters were measured, including open-field dose profiles to determine flatness and symmetry of photon and electron beams. Finally, film was employed to validate dose distributions produced by complex computerised treatment planning techniques. Our conclusion is that the EDR-2 film is an effective tool for relative dosimetry of photon and electron beams.

Medical PhysicsVolume 27, Issue 3 p. 445-447 Radiation treatment physics Comment on “AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams” [Med. Phys. 26, 1847–1870 (1999)] Faiz M. Khan, Faiz M. Khan Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Electronic mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Faiz M. Khan, Faiz M. Khan Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Electronic mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 08 March 2000 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598894Citations: 7 0094-2405, Medical Physics, 26, 1847 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume27, Issue3March 2000Pages 445-447 RelatedInformation

The paper presents Fricke-to-water dose conversion and wall correction factors for Fricke ferrous sulphate dosimetry in high-energy electron beams. The dose conversion factor has been calculated as the ratio of the mean dose in water to the mean dose in the Fricke solution with a water-walled vessel and the wall correction factor accounts for the change in the Fricke dose due to the presence of the non-water wall material. The EGS4 (electron gamma shower version 4) Monte Carlo code system has been employed in the work together with the application of a correlated sampling variance reduction technique. The results show that for a Fricke dosimeter of 1.534 cm diameter and 5.5 cm length the dose conversion factor is nearly constant at 1.004 (within 0.1%) for electron energies of 11-25 MeV if the dosimeter is placed at the depth of maximum dose but can vary by a few per cent if the dosimeter is placed on the descending portion of the depth-dose curve.

The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of using polycrystalline lithium formate for EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance) dosimetry of clinical electron beams, with the main focus on the dose-to-water energy response. Lithium formate dosimeters were irradiated using 60Co γ-rays and 6–20 MeV electrons in a PMMA phantom to doses in the range of 3–9 Gy. A plane-parallel ion chamber was used for water-based absolute dosimetry. In addition, the electron/photon transport was simulated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. From the EPR measurements, the standard deviation of single dosimeter readings was 1.2%. The experimental energy response (the lithium formate dosimeter reading per absorbed dose to water for electrons relative to that for 60Co γ rays) was nearly independent of the electron energy and on average 0.99 ± 0.03. The Monte Carlo calculated energy response was on average 0.5% higher than the experimental energy response, the difference being not significant. Simulations with water and polystyrene as irradiation media indicated that the energy response of lithium formate dosimeters was nearly independent of the phantom materials. In conclusion, lithium formate EPR dosimetry of clinical electron beams provides precise dose measurements with low dependence on the electron energy.

The high dose and dose-per-pulse rates (up to 130 mGy/pulse) produced by some intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) accelerators pose specific dosimetric problems due to the high density of electric charge per pulse produced in the ionization chamber cavity. In particular, the correction factor for ion recombination, ks, calculated with the traditional two-voltage method is significantly overestimated and three alternative models have been proposed in the literature allowing for the presence of a free-electron component. However, at present there is no general consensus on the best model to assess the ion recombination correction and controversy remains on the uncertainty associated with ks.In the present work we adopted a Monte Carlo (MC) approach to assess the uncertainty associated with the ion recombination correction in plane-parallel chambers used in high dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry. The uncertainty associated with ks was calculated for the following plane-parallel ionization chambers: Scanditronix/Wellhofer Parallel Plate Chamber PPC05 and PPC40, PTW Advanced Markus Model 34 045 and PTW Roos Model 34 001. Input variables for MC calculations were derived from experimental data at 28 and 73 mGy/pulse.Taken together, the results of this study indicate that ks values calculated according to the three ion recombination models do not overlap within their standard uncertainties, suggesting that an additional type-B uncertainty component would be necessary to take into account possible differences between the models. Our results indicate that the combined relative standard uncertainty in ks should be calculated as the sum in quadrature of a (type-A) MC-based uncertainty component and a (type-B) uncertainty contribution evaluated assuming a uniform distribution between ks values obtained from the two extreme models.

Two of the most popular dosimetry systems used for calibration of megavoltage photon and electron beams in radiation therapy are (i) cylindrical Farmer-type chambers in liquid water and (ii) Holt Memorial parallel-plate chambers in clear polystyrene. Since implementation of the AAPM TG-21 calibration protocol, the Radiological Physics Center (which uses the Farmer in-water system) has compared machine calibrations on two occasions with those of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (which uses the Holt in-polystyrene system). Two years post publication of the TG-51 protocol, 70% of the clinics monitored by the RPC still use TG-21. Seventeen photon beams from cobalt-60 to 18 MV and 31 electron beams from 6 to 20 MeV were compared using the TG-21 protocol. These data represent the most comprehensive comparison of the two most popular systems in use. Based on the average percent difference, the two systems yielded the same absorbed dose to water at the reference point in phantom to within 1.5% for both modalities. No energy dependence was evident in the results; however, a systematic average percent difference between photons and electrons was seen, with the Farmer in-water system consistently predicting a dose 1.3% lower for electrons than the Holt in-polystyrene system. For photons both systems predicted the same dose to within 0.3% on average. When a physicist converts from TG-21 to TG-51, these data may be of assistance in explaining unexpected changes in output that are different from previously published values. Implementation of the TG-51 protocol should eliminate any of the observed differences in electron beam dosimetry between the two dosimetry systems because the Holt system cannot be used with TG-51. PACS number(s): 87.53.-j, 87.53.-j

Cylindrical ionization chambers produce perturbations (gradient and fluence) in the medium, and hence the point of measurement is not accurately defined in electron beam dosimetry. The gradient perturbation is often corrected by a shift method depending on the type of ion chamber. The shift is in the range of 0.33-0.85 times the inner radius ( r) of the ion chamber, upstream from the centre of the chamber, depending upon the dosimetry protocol. This variation in shift causes the surface dose to be uncertain due to the high dose gradient. An investigation was conducted to estimate the effective point of measurement of cylindrical ion chambers in electron beams. Ionization measurements were taken with the ion chamber in air and in a phantom at source to chamber distances of <100 cm and >100 cm respectively. The data in air and in the phantom were fitted with the inverse square and electron depth dose functions, respectively. The intersection of the two functions provides an accurate estimate of the ion chamber shift and the surface dose. Our results show that the shift correction for an ion chamber is energy dependent. The measured shifts vary from 0.9 r to 0.5 r between 6 MeV and 20 MeV beams respectively. The surface dose measured with the ion chambers and mathematically determined values are in agreement to within 3%. The method presented in this report is unambiguous, fast and reliable for the estimation of surface dose and the shift needed in electron beam dosimetry.

The purpose of this study is to calculate correction factors for plastic water (PW) and plastic water diagnostic-therapy (PWDT) phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system. A water-to-plastic ionization conversion factor k(pl) for PW and PWDT was computed for several commonly used Farmer-type ionization chambers with different wall materials in the range of 4-18 MV photon beams. For electron beams, a depth-scaling factor c(pl) and a chamber-dependent fluence correction factor h(pl) for both phantoms were also calculated in combination with NACP-02 and Roos plane-parallel ionization chambers in the range of 4-18 MeV. The h(pl) values for the plane-parallel chambers were evaluated from the electron fluence correction factor phi(pl)w and wall correction factors P(wall,w) and P(wall,pl) for a combination of water or plastic materials. The calculated k(pl) and h(pl) values were verified by comparison with the measured values. A set of k(pl) values computed for the Farmer-type chambers was equal to unity within 0.5% for PW and PWDT in photon beams. The k(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. For electron beams, the c(pl) values computed for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.000 and from 0.992 to 0.997, respectively, in the range of 4-18 MeV. The phi(pl)w values for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.001 and from 1.004 to 1.001, respectively, at a reference depth in the range of 4-18 MeV. The difference in P(wall) between water and plastic materials for the plane-parallel chambers was 0.8% at a maximum. Finally, h(pl) values evaluated for plastic materials were equal to unity within 0.6% for NACP-02 and Roos chambers. The h(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. The absorbed dose to water from ionization chamber measurements in PW and PWDT plastic materials corresponds to that in water within 1%. Both phantoms can thus be used as a substitute for water for photon and electron dosimetry.

214 - Electron beams dosimetry with NACP plane parallel chamber according to NCS protocol