Abstract

BackgroundValidated biomarkers could catalyze environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) research. ObjectivesLeveraging an EED histology scoring system, this multicountry analysis examined biomarker associations with duodenal histology features among children with EED. We also examined differences in 2-h compared with 1-h urine collections in the lactulose rhamnose (LR) dual sugar test. MethodsThree cohorts of undernourished children unresponsive to nutrition intervention underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and duodenal biopsies. Histopathology scores were compared to fecal calprotectin (CAL), myeloperoxidase (MPO), neopterin (NEO), and urinary LR ratio and lactulose percentage recovery. Log-transformed biomarkers were used in linear regressions adjusted for age, center, and sample collection–biopsy time interval in multivariable models. ResultsData on >1 biomarker were available for 120 Bangladeshi (CAL, MPO, NEO, and LR), 63 Pakistani (MPO, NEO, and LR), and 63 Zambian children (CAL). Median age at endoscopy was similar (19 mo) across centers. Median sample collection prior to endoscopy was consistent with each center’s study design: 2 wk in Bangladesh (urine and stool) and Zambia (stool), and 6 (urine) and 11 (stool) mo in Pakistan. In multivariable models, intraepithelial lymphocytes were associated with CAL (exponentiated [exp.] coefficient: 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1, 1.41), intramucosal Brunner’s glands with MPO (exp. coefficient: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.69) and NEO (exp. coefficient: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.7), and chronic inflammation with NEO (exp. coefficient: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.17). Intraepithelial lymphocytes were associated with lactulose % recovery (exp. coefficient: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.41). LR recovery was substantially lower in 1-h collections than in 2-h collections. ConclusionsFour commonly used markers of enteric dysfunction were associated with specific histologic features. One-hour urine collection may be insufficient to reflect small bowel permeability in LR testing. While acknowledging the challenges with obtaining relevant tissue, these findings form the basis for further EED biomarker validation research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.