Abstract

Extractive dividing-wall column (E-DWC) is a promising alternative to current bioethanol recovery and purification processes, garnering interest from the research community. In this study, E-DWC and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes for bioethanol recovery/purification are studied on a consistent basis, and an economic evaluation of both processes is made after heat integration and optimization. For this, realistic feed stream of 10wt% ethanol, 89.9wt% water and 0.1wt% carbon dioxide is considered, and both processes are simulated in Aspen HYSYS v8.2. PSA process involves distillation for removing most of water, before dehydration by PSA. Results indicate that, while E-DWC process has advantages over PSA process in terms of capital cost and thermal energy demand, PSA process still has 33% lower cost of manufacture per unit product than E-DWC process, mostly because of solvent loss. This shows that it is not sufficient to consider only energy requirement in assessing the feasibility of a promising technology; rather, an overall economic evaluation under realistic conditions should be performed. In addition, this work has investigated economies of scale and identified the optimal production capacity of PSA process for bioethanol recovery/purification.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.