Abstract

Gated computed tomography (CT) might not adequately predict occurrence of post-implantation transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) complications in hostile aortic root as it would require a more complex integration of morphological, functional and hemodynamical parameters. We used a computational framework based on finite element analysis (FEA) to simulate patient-specific implantation. Application of biomechanical modelling using FEA to gated-CT was able to demonstrate the relation of the device with voluminous calcification, its consequent misalignment and a significant stent deformation. Use of FEA and other advanced computed predictive modelling techniques as an adjunct to CT scan could improve our understanding of TAVR, potentially predict complications and fate of the devices after implantation and inform patient-specific treatment.

Highlights

  • The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is still hampered by daunting complications mainly related to hostile anatomical characteristics of the aortic root

  • Biomechanical modelling and finite element analysis (FEA) was performed on pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) scans to simulate implantation and infer potential complications deriving from the patient-specific aortic root anatomy and calcification distribution

  • CT scan at the moment of readmission showed a marked change in the size of the annulus and in the height of the coronaries relative to annulus (3 mm for the right coronary and 5 mm for the left coronary; change from baseline −7 mm and −6 mm respectively) (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is still hampered by daunting complications mainly related to hostile anatomical characteristics of the aortic root. The presence of voluminous calcifications can severely impair device deployment leading to paravalvular regurgitation [1,2,3] valvular complications [4] or stress damage to the aorta [5]. The use of finite element analysis (FEA) and other advanced computed predictive modelling techniques [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] in combination with CT scan could improve our understanding of TAVR, potentially predict complications and tailor patient-specific implantations

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.