Abstract

The last ten years have been marked by important discoveries and scientificadvances in our understanding of biodiversity. The emergence of new fields,such as bioinformatics, ecoinformatics, and computational ecology (Helly et al.,1995; Spengler, 2000; Green et al., 2005) has brought about an informationalrevolution by making available massive data sets on the composition, distribu-tion and abundance of biodiversity from local to global scales and from genesto ecosystems. This has in turn changed biodiversity sciences, expanding thescale of analysis of ecological systems wherein biodiversity resides. Whilethe 1970s and 1980s were marked by studies at local scales, the 1990s weremarked by gaining access to regional, continental and global scale analyses.In parallel, and in part as a consequence of the above trend, there has been ashift from approaches that emphasize the highly variable and idiosyncraticnature of ecological systems to a view that emphasizes the action of firstprinciples, natural laws and zeroth order approaches (the macroscopicapproach hereafter).The small-scale approach can be illustrated by a representative quotationfrom Diamond and Case (1986, p. x): ‘‘The answers to general ecological ques-tions are rarely universal laws, like those of physics. Instead, the answers areconditional statements such as: for a community of species with properties A

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.