Bio- and immunoactive luteinizing hormone responses to low doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH): dose-response curves in GnRH-deficient men.

Abstract

Previous investigations of the effects of GnRH on pituitary LH responses in normal men required pharmacological doses of GnRH to avoid the confounding effects of endogenous GnRH secretion and employed nonphysiological dose intervals. To examine the role of GnRH in determining both the qualitative and quantitative nature of physiological LH responses, we studied five GnRH-deficient men in whom pituitary and gonadal function had been normalized with GnRH replacement. Both bio- and immunoactive LH responses were evaluated in these men after a wide range of GnRH doses (7.5-250 ng/kg) administered at a physiological frequency (every 2 h), while gonadal steroid levels were within the normal adult male range. In addition, the amplitude and contour of the immunoactive LH pulses were compared to those of 15 normal men to assure that these experiments achieved physiological pituitary responses. The relationship between bio- and immunoactive LH was compared between patients, between doses as the amount of GnRH was increased, and within pulses of LH. As the dose of GnRH was increased, both bio- and immunoactive LH responses increased in a log-linear fashion when assessed by both amplitude (r = 0.96 for bioactive LH and r = 0.98 for immunoactive LH) and area under the curve (r = 0.99 for bioactive LH and r = 0.97 for immunoactive LH). GnRH doses of 7.5 and 25 ng/kg produced LH responses with amplitudes similar to those in normal men. The relationship between bio- and immunoactive LH between patients and between differing doses of GnRH was analyzed by comparing the slopes of lines fit to individual bioactive vs. immunoactive LH plots after each dose of GnRH in each patient. There was a marked variation in the relationship of bio- to immunoactive LH between patients (P less than 0.005). No change was found in the biopotency of LH as the dose of GnRH was increased (P less than 0.10). Finally, no variation of the bioactivity of LH was evident within individual pulses. We conclude that a log-linear relationship exists between doses of GnRH that produce physiological LH pulses and both bio- and immunoactive LH responses; the bioactivity of secreted LH varies markedly between patients; the relative bioactivity of LH in an individual does not change as the dose of GnRH is increased; and no change in bioactivity of LH responses was demonstrated within pulses of LH.