Abstract

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary trees that are used by biologists to represent the evolution of organisms which have undergone reticulate evolution. Essentially, a phylogenetic network is a directed acyclic graph having a unique root in which the leaves are labelled by a given set of species. Recently, some approaches have been developed to construct phylogenetic networks from collections of networks on 2- and 3-leaved networks, which are known as binets and trinets, respectively. Here we study in more depth properties of collections of binets, one of the simplest possible types of networks into which a phylogenetic network can be decomposed. More specifically, we show that if a collection of level-1 binets is compatible with some binary network, then it is also compatible with a binary level-1 network. Our proofs are based on useful structural results concerning lowest stable ancestors in networks. In addition, we show that, although the binets do not determine the topology of the network, they do determine the number of reticulations in the network, which is one of its most important parameters. We also consider algorithmic questions concerning binets. We show that deciding whether an arbitrary set of binets is compatible with some network is at least as hard as the well-known graph isomorphism problem. However, if we restrict to level-1 binets, it is possible to decide in polynomial time whether there exists a binary network that displays all the binets. We also show that to find a network that displays a maximum number of the binets is NP-hard, but that there exists a simple polynomial-time 1/3-approximation algorithm for this problem. It is hoped that these results will eventually assist in the development of new methods for constructing phylogenetic networks from collections of smaller networks.

Highlights

  • Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary trees which biologists use to represent the evolution of species that have undergone reticulate evolution

  • We have shown that the collection of level-1 binets displayed by a binary phylogenetic network can be displayed by some level-1 network, but is there some canonical level-1 network that could be used to display such a collection? In addition, can we count the number of binary level-1 networks that display a dense compatible collection of binets? We have seen that the collection of binets displayed by a binary level-1 network determine its reticulation number

  • It is natural to ask which properties of a phylogenetic network in general are determined by its binets?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary trees which biologists use to represent the evolution of species that have undergone reticulate evolution. After introducing some preliminaries concerning phylogenetic networks, we derive a key structural result for networks (Corollary 1) which is useful in identifying which of the two possible types of binet is displayed on two leaves within a binary phylogenetic network (that is a network in which all internal vertices have degree 3) This reduces the problem of understanding binets displayed by arbitrary binary networks to level-1 networks To prove this result, we develop a framework which implies that there is a polynomial-time algorithm in |X | for deciding whether or not a collection of level-1 binets with combined leaf set X can be displayed by some network with leaf set X , and, if it is, gives a level-1 network that does this

Digraphs
Phylogenetic Networks
Stable Ancestors and Binets
A Structure Theorem
Displaying Binets by Binary Networks
Binets Determine the Number of Reticulations of a Binary Level-1 Network
Complexity of Binet Compatibility
Maximum Binet Compatibility
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.