Abstract

The purpose of this article is to stimulate debate about the developing paradoxes and dilemmas facing the university academic. This article argues that academics are increasingly being steeped in an inauthentic existence due, at least partly to, egocentrism and sociocentrism. A modest transdisciplinary- existential analytical framework is applied as an intellectual method to reflect on the prevailing monological perspectives stifling the role of academics, in working towards building a more sustainable future. Using concepts such as the subject, facticity and transcendence, the article investigates the dialectical tensions between some of these monological perspectives and proposes avenues to create new possibilities to progress the role of the academic. The article argues that the multilogical perspectives of transdisciplinary thinking and the empowering perspectives of existential thinking can provide academics with the necessary conceptual tools to transcend egocentrism and sociocentrism. While it is likely that new contradictions will emerge as a result of this synthesis, open-minded academics are urged to ignite their imaginative powers and take up the challenge of creating and acting on new possibilities. A transdisciplinary-existential dialectical approach can provide a richer understanding of present dilemmas in academia and the world, and suggest more satisfying paths to a sustainable future.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this article is to stimulate debate about the developing paradoxes and dilemmas facing the university academic

  • Academics can no longer afford to ignore their complicity in propagating prevailing dogmas if they wish to transcend this state of disenchantment and advance a more sustainable future (De Beer, 2014)

  • It is shown that these perspectives share a similar conception as far as the human subject is concerned and may be useful in creating possibilities for academics to move beyond current dogmas

Read more

Summary

The problem: ‘fleeing’ from personal responsibility

Td The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 11(2) November 2015, Special edition: Re-enchantment, pp. 1-12. Naidoo members of community development projects, course developers and evaluators, and internal and external examiners of research reports and dissertations. They play an important part in informal roles such as the mentoring of colleagues and in discourse with peers and other social groups. The tensions inherent in prevailing perspectives are examined with alternatives to create new possibilities to advance the role of the academic in the university. Transdisciplinary and existential perspectives of re-enchantment themselves and their broader community by framing their challenges within a transdisciplinary-existential mindset

Academia’s dilemmas
The obstacles: egocentrism and sociocentrism
Disclosing Being: facticity and transcendence
The return to prominence of the subject: finding spaces for change
Beyond the academic’s dilemma

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.