Abstract

Early attempts to classify shopping activity often took a relatively simple approach, largely driven by the lack of reliable data beyond fascia name and retail outlet counts by centre. There seems to be a consensus amongst contemporary scholars, commercial research consultancies and retailers that more comprehensive classifications would generate better-informed debate on changes in the urban economic landscape, as well as providing the basis for a more effective comparison of retail centres across time and space, particularly given the availability of new data sources and techniques and in the context of the transformational changes presently affecting the retail sector. This paper seeks to demonstrate the interrelationship between supply and demand for retailing services by integrating newly available data sources within a rigorously specified classification methodology. This in turn provides new insight into the multidimensional and dynamic taxonomy of consumption spaces within Great Britain. First, such a contribution is significant in that it moves debate within the literature past simple linear scaling of retail centre function to a more nuanced understanding of multiple functional forms; and second, in that it provides a nationally comparative and dynamic framework through which the evolution of retail structures can be evaluated. Using non-hierarchical clustering techniques, the results are presented in the form of a two-tier classification with 5 distinctive ‘coarse’ clusters and 15 more detailed and nested sub-clusters. The paper concludes that more nuanced and dynamic classifications of this kind can help deliver more effective insights into changing role of retailing and consumer services in urban areas across space and through time and will have implications for a variety of stakeholders.

Highlights

  • The idea of classifying and ranking urban centres based upon their retail role and function, often using a selection of supply side attributes, is not new

  • Our analysis takes into consideration potential spatial interaction across a number of scales (Batty, 2008) and examines the growing role of non-retail functions in our town centres and high streets, some of which will increasingly move ‘beyond retail’

  • It contributes to the debate on the extent to which central place principles can be applied to British retail centres

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The idea of classifying and ranking urban centres based upon their retail role and function, often using a selection of supply side attributes, is not new Such retail taxonomies and rankings have been developed in many countries to differentiate one centre from another for a variety of purposes: in order to inform investment or development decisions; to assist in the formulation of retail planning and urban economic policy; and, as retailing itself has evolved, to assist in monitoring the changing locational characteristics of retail real estate (Reynolds and Schiller, 1992). Attempts to classify centres often took a relatively simple approach, largely driven by the lack of reliable data beyond fascia name and establishment counts by centre These exercises were generally oriented around an assumption that such a ranking of centres would be hierarchically organised. There is still a view that different orders of shopping and non-shopping activities exist and that these can be associated with a particular centre’s anticipated level of vitality and viability, its resilience to economic and competitive shocks or retailer’s locational preferences (Jansen et al, 2014; Reynolds and Schiller, 1992; Wrigley and Dolega, 2011)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.