Abstract
ABSTRACTThe Indian constitution is celebrated by several commentators for guarantees given to religious minorities in the sphere of education. These constitutional provisions have faced considerable criticism from Hindu nationalists in India, who see them as unfair concessions to minorities. At the same time, jurisprudence on minority educational rights has also been criticised for exempting schools from progressive legislation like the Right to Education (RTE) Act. Is it possible to provide an account of secularism that permits rights specifically for religious minorities, while, at the same time, allowing for these to be qualified in ways that do not undermine legislation like the RTE? In this article, it is argued that there is indeed a conception of secularism that responds to this dual challenge. Rajeev Bhargava’s notion of principled distance best captures the operation of secularism in the debate over minority educational rights in India. It is then demonstrated that this conception possesses the conceptual resources to defend rights for minority educational institutions while qualifying these insofar as other interests – such as those relating to the RTE – are concerned.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
