Abstract

On most American college campuses today, students enjoy the same rights to free speech as do all citizens. They are free, for example, to raise money and distribute literature on behalf of political causes. But in the early 1960s these rights were still routinely denied collegians. When, in the fall of 1964, students at the University of California at Berkeley sought to attract campus support for the civil rights movement?which was working to end racial discrimination and segregation in America?they encountered opposition from the university's president and deans. These university officials, citing a formerly unenforced school regula tion which prohibited campus political advocacy, told students they could not raise money or distribute literature on campus for the civil rights movement or any other off-campus political cause. Students at Berkeley united in October 1964 to fight these political restrictions. Their successful campaign to gain free speech rights at college became known as the Berkeley Free Speech Movement. It was the first major cam pus rebellion of the turbulent 1960s. The first major confrontation in the Berkeley free speech controversy occurred on October 1, 1964, when student ac tivists set up tables on university property to raise donations for civil rights organizations. This defied the ban on campus political advocacy. The students had decided to defy the ban because they viewed it not only as an infringement on their free speech rights, but also as an attempt to undermine the growing involvement of Berkeley students in the civil rights movement.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.