Abstract
Critics and writers have generally held farce in low esteem: for example, L.J. Potts describes it as "comedy with the meaning left out"; Allardyce Nicoll regards "gross and improbable characterisation" as symptomatic of it; and Cleanth Brooks and Robert B. Heilman make these astonishing assertions in their drama textbook: "the situations in farce do not mean anything: ... [F]arce is by its own nature one-dimensional. ... Any farce ... fails, by being fundamentally off-center, to challenge greatness or even seriousness." More recent studies, both of the genre itself (Jessica M. Davis's Farce) and of individual practitioners (C.W.E. Bigsby's Joe Orton5 ) have begun to redress the balance, and some writers on contemporary drama (Katharine J. Worth's Revolutions in Modern English Drama) show a lively appreciation of farce's potential. Yet critical discussion still tends to ring an apologetic note. When Jessica M. Davis takes an O.E.D. definition as her starting-point and expands it herself, she does not seem to notice that the resulting description neglects the genre's capacities for serious import, subtlety, and laughter that repays analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.