Behavioural responses of overwintering herring to candidate whale deterrent signals

Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and killer whale (Orcinus orca) feeding aggregations for foraging on herring (Clupea harengus) in Northern Norway

Fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) and humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) are commonly found in the Norwegian Sea during the summer months. Records from around 1995 to 2004 show that their distribution patterns were mainly associated with those of macro-zooplankton. More recent studies conducted from 2009 to 2012 demonstrate marked shifts, with fin whale distribution related to pelagic fish distribution, decreasing densities of humpbacks, and increased densities of toothed whales. During the same period, historically large abundances of pelagic planktivorous fish in the Norwegian Sea were reported. The goals of this study were to examine the summer distribution of fin and humpback whales from 2013 to 2018 and to assess the potential association between distribution and environmental impact factors. Results suggest a pronounced northerly shift in distribution for both species, a feeding hotspot for fin whales at the shelf area between Svalbard and Norway, and one near Bear Island for humpback whales. Fin whale distribution was associated with that of blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) and capelin (Mallotus villosus), whereas humpback whale distribution was associated with that of euphausiids (Meganyctiphanes norvegica, Thysanoessa longicaudata, andThysanoessa inermis), capelin, and herring (Clupea harengus). However, a significant negative spatial correlation was found between whale occurrence and the widely expanding population of northeast Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus). The results of this study suggest that the prey composition of fin and humpback whales in recent years contain a large proportion of fish. The apparent northerly shift in the distribution of these whale species is largely determined by the availability of prey, but it likely is also impacted by direct or indirect interspecific interactions, especially with killer whales (Orcinus orca). Such large-scale pronounced changes in distribution seem to confirm a high degree of plasticity in fin and humpback whale feeding in the Norwegian Sea.

Fishery inspector logbooks were used to estimate fishing gear interaction rates for humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) and killer (Orcinus orca) whales in Norwegian purse seine fisheries for herring from 2011 to 2020. Estimated rates were applied to fisheries data to estimate fleet‐wide totals. Estimates showed that in a 10‐year period, a total of 78 humpback whales, 95% CI [41, 145] and 100 killer whales, 95% CI [63, 176] were entrapped in purse seines. Most whales were disentangled alive, with an estimated mortality of 5%, CV 0.69, 95% CI [0.0, 11.8] and 6%, CV 0.48, 95% CI [0.3, 11.9], respectively. The average yearly mortality over the study period was thus approximately 0.60 killer whales and 0.39 humpback whales corresponding to 0.008% and 0.007% of the respective abundance estimates for these whale species in Norwegian waters. Given the Potential Biological Removal sustainability limits of 98 humpbacks and 161 killer whales per year, it may be concluded that, by itself, the average yearly mortality incurred by these whale populations by Norwegian fisheries does not constitute a significant risk to either of these species, but bycatch in Norwegian purse seine fisheries may not be the only source of anthropogenic mortality.

Cultured cetaceans

Shipboard surveys were conducted along the Aleutian Islands in 2001 and 2002 to assess the influence of a suite of biophysical parameters on regional patterns in the distribution of cetaceans and Steller sea lions (SSL; Eumetopias jubatus). Distributions of four large whale species: fin (Balaenoptera physalus), humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), minke (B. acutorostrata) and sperm (Physeter macrocephalus) aligned with proposed metapopulation breaks in diet and population trend of SSLs. Dall's porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli) and killer whales (Orcinus orca) were widely distributed throughout the study area, and killer whales were particularly prevalent along the north Aleutian Island coastlines between Unimak Pass and Samalga Pass. Biopsies determined that most killer whales (92%) were of the piscivorous (resident) ecotype as opposed to the mammal‐eating (transient) ecotype observed in 2002 only. Generalized additive models (GAMs) were used to explore relationships between these multispecies patterns in distribution, oceanographic variables (salinity, temperature, fluorescence and depth) and proximity to six Aleutian passes. The GAMs indicated the best‐fit models and most significant correlations as determined by the Akaike function and Cp‐statistics were: depth and proximity to the nearest measured pass for SSLs and all cetaceans, respectively; frequencies of herring and salmon in SSL diet with population trend; fluorescence in the top 50 m with occurrence of humpback, minke, and killer whales; and surface temperature with occurrence of humpback, killer, and sperm whales. Results of the GAM analyses suggest foci for future investigation of relationships between physical variables and interspecific patterns of marine mammal distribution.

Mixed species groups are usually associated with group protection to avoid predation. Reports of killer whale (Orcinus orca) occurrence and attacks are scarce in Brazilian waters. Here we report the first case of an attack by killer whales on a mixed group of humpbacks (Megaptera novaeangliae) and a southern right whale (Eubalaena australis). This is also the first report of humpback whales possibly interfering with killer whales harassing right whales. The recent increase in humpback and southern right whale populations in Brazil may be influencing the presence of killer whales, which are known to attack humpback whales.

Isotopic evidence of the effect of warming on the northern Antarctic Peninsula ecosystem

Eavesdropping, the detection of communication signals by unintended receivers, can be beneficial in predator-prey interactions, competition, and cooperation. The cosmopolitan killer whaleOrcinus orcahas diverged into several ecotypes which exhibit specialised diets and different vocal behaviours. These ecotypes have diverse ecological relationships with other marine mammal species, and sound could be a reliable sensory modality for eavesdroppers to discriminate between ecotypes and thereby respond adaptively. Here, we tested whether humpback whalesMegaptera novaeangliaein the Northeast Atlantic responded differently to playback of the sounds of 2 killer whale ecotypes, Northeast Atlantic herring-feeding killer whales representing food competitors and Northeast Pacific mammal-eating killer whales simulating potential predators. We used animal-borne tags and surface visual observations to monitor the behaviour of humpback whales throughout the playback experiments. Humpback whales clearly approached the source of herring-feeding killer whale sounds (5 of 6 cases), suggesting a ‘dinner-bell’ attraction effect. Responses to mammal-eating killer whale sounds varied with the context of presentation: playback elicited strong avoidance responses by humpback whales in offshore waters during summer (7 of 8 cases), whereas the whales either approached (2 of 4 cases) or avoided (2 of 4 cases) the sound source in inshore waters during winter. These results indicate that humpback whales may be able to functionally discriminate between the sounds of different killer whale ecotypes. Acoustic discrimination of heterospecific sounds may be widespread among marine mammals, suggesting that marine mammals could rely on eavesdropping as a primary source of information to make decisions during heterospecific encounters.

We quantified 13C, 15N,18O, and Hg concentrations in the muscle of calf and immature humpback whales stranded along the coast of the North Pacific Ocean around Hokkaido, Japan, and investigated those changes owing to the lactation. Next, we compared these concentrations in stranded humpback whale calves with those in stranded fin whale and North Pacific right whale calves, and stranded calves from other species reported previously [1,2]. We further compared those concentrations in stranded fin whales with those in fin whales hunted from the North Atlantic and Antarctic Oceans. The δ13C value in humpback whale calves increased with body length (7.0-8.7 m), whereas the δ18O values tended to decrease. In contrast, a small δ15Nenriched peak was found in middle-sized calves. Humpback whale calves had trace Hg concentrations (≤0.05 μg/wet g), whereas these concentrations exceeded 0.10 μg/wet g in immature humpback whales. These changes in the δ13C, δ15N, and δ18O values and Hg concentrations in humpback whales could reflect a feeding shift from milk to solid foods. The δ13C and δ15N levels of calves, humpback and fin whales, and common minke whales reported previously [1] were similar, slightly higher than those of North Pacific right whales and significantly lower than those of killer whales [2]. These findings suggest that the δ13C and δ15N values in the milk and weaning solid foods of humpback, fin, and common minke whales are similar (opportunistic fish eaters), slightly different from North Pacific right whales (zooplankton eaters), and markedly different from killer whales (highest predator). Fin whales stranded in the North Pacific Ocean could be distinguished from fin whales hunted from the North Atlantic and Antarctic Oceans using δ13C, δ15N, and δ18O values. The δ18O values, combined with the δ13C and δ15N values could be an excellent proxy to discriminate fin whales from the three oceans.

Whale song

We compared the number of cetaceans seen during surveys of seabird distribution in the vicinity of the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, during two periods, 1975-78 (3867 km surveyed) and 1987-89 (6101 km surveyed). During the 1980s, we saw increased numbers of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) (0 to 66 individuals), minke whales (B. acutorostrata) (3 to 38 individuals), humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) (0 to 24 individuals), killer whales (Orcinus orca) (5 to 58 individuals), and Dall's porpoises (Phocoenoides dalli) (101 to 241 individuals). It could not be determined whether these changes reflected changes in the numbers of these species in the Bering Sea, or simply local changes in their foraging or distribution patterns. Fin, humpback and minke whales were seen foraging in the vicinity of large flocks of birds that were eating euphausiids (Thysanoessa raschii and T. inermis).Key words: Fin whale, minke whale, humpback whale, killer whale, Dall’s porpoise, Balaenoptera physalus, Balaenoptera acutorostrata, Megaptera novaeangliae, Orcinus orca, Phocoenoides dalli, Bering Sea, whale foraging

As in other populations of killer whales, Orcinus orca, prey selectivity in the North Atlantic population may indicate behaviourally or ecologically distinct types of killer whales. Some killer whale ecotypes are known to prey on large whales, but the ecological impact of such predation events is unknown. Since killer whale attacks on humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, are rarely witnessed, resultant scars may be used to determine the frequency of non-fatal predatory interactions. Using images from the North Atlantic Humpback Whale Catalogue (NAHWC), we examined humpback whale flukes for the presence of rake marks from killer whales (N = 5040). Scarring frequencies range from 2.7 to 17.4% and differ significantly among five regions of the North Atlantic (Gulf of Maine, Canada, West Greenland, Iceland and Norway). The scarring rate in the Canada region is significantly higher than all other regions, and Norway has a significantly lower scarring rate than all other regions, despite more frequently reported killer whale sightings in that region. Within the western North Atlantic, Canada has a scarring rate nearly twice that of either the Gulf of Maine or West Greenland. These data may reflect differential prey choice among killer whale ecotypes and/or the distribution of specific ecotypes across the North Atlantic basin.

Unoccupied aerial system (UAS) technologies applied to health assessments of large whales can have positive implications for progressive management. We focused on the collection of cetacean respiratory blow samples for endocrine, DNA profiling, microbial metabarcoding, and metagenomics analyses, with the goal of improving management of large whale populations. Blow samples were collected from humpback ( Megaptera novaeangliae, n = 109 samples analyzed), blue ( Balaenoptera musculus, n = 21 samples analyzed), and killer whale ( Orcinus orca, n = 1 sample analyzed) species, as well as the responses of the whales to the collection of their blow by UAS. Endocrine analyses were validated for 5 steroid hormones in humpback whales and 4 hormones in blue whales. For DNA profiling, we attempted to extract and amplify nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, resulting in sequencing of mtDNA haplotypes for 54% of samples, identification of sex for 39%, and individual identification by microsatellite genotyping for 17%. The DNA profiles of 2 of the blow samples from humpback whales were matched to a DNA register for this regional population. Metagenomic and microbial metabarcoding classifications found a diverse number of bacteria, eukaryotes, and viruses in humpback whale blow. Although a significant portion of classifications were found in both seawater and blow, several of the most abundant organisms were present only in blow samples, suggesting they are true members of the respiratory microbiome. A comprehensive integration of laboratory‐based approaches using noninvasive UAS collection technologies could become an important management tool for health assessments of large cetaceans, especially for species listed as endangered. The addition of individual and population‐level health assessments to currently practiced stewardship of large whales, renders them as excellent sentinels of ocean health. © 2021 The Wildlife Society.

To support optimal monitoring and enforcement investment, management aimed at minimizing disturbance to wildlife requires an understanding of how regulatory compliance might vary spatially as well as across species and human-user groups. In the Salish Sea, humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and two ecotypes (southern resident and Bigg's) of killer whales (Orcinus orca) now interact with a large and growing number of small commercial and recreational vessels that partake in whale watching. Those vessels often approach close to cetaceans and thus pose risk via collision, marine noise and pollution, exposure to which may result in disturbance, injury and death. The primary management tool for mitigating impacts is minimum distance regulations. Compliance, however, is poorly understood. We examined commercial and recreational small vessel compliance with viewing distances across two seasons (June–September 2018 and 2019) in over ≈404 h of on-water observation. Overall vessel compliance was nearly 80%, but several distinct patterns emerged. Recreational boats were significantly more likely to violate distance regulations and boaters were more likely to be non-compliant around killer whales. Compliance did not vary with day of week or time of day. Spatially, non-compliance was concentrated in waters closer to coastal communities. Collectively, these patterns suggest that optimal enforcement could be targeted to identify areas of high non-compliance, especially for killer whales, with effort spread across days and times. Finally, we discuss how investments in education could target recreational boaters at a time when multiple and interacting stressors are accumulating in the Salish Sea.

Killer whales (Orcinus orca) have only infrequently been reported from Hawaiian waters, and most of what is known about killer whales worldwide comes from studies in coastal temperate waters. Here we present 21 records of killer whales from within the Hawaiian Exclusive Economic Zone between 1994 and 2004. Killer whales were recorded nine months of the year, most around the main Hawaiian Islands. Although there were more records than expected during the period when humpback whales are abundant around the Islands, there is likely an increase in sighting effort during that period. Killer whales were documented feeding on both a humpback whale and cephalopods, and two species of small cetaceans were observed fleeing from killer whales. Although it is possible that there are both marine mammal–eating and cephalopod-eating populations within Hawaiian waters, it seems more likely that Hawaiian killer whales may not exhibit foraging specializations as documented for coastal temperate populations. Saddle...